Total servers: 4
107.185.22.128
Unknown
Unknown – 0lt
IP: 107.185.22.128
Game Mode:
Lives: 0
Max Kills: 0
Version: LieroX 0.56b
Players:
109.240.32.186
Unknown
Unknown – 0lt
IP: 109.240.32.186
Game Mode:
Lives: 0
Max Kills: 0
Version: LieroX 0.56b
Players:
DE nonstop + voting
Liero v1.0 – 100lt
IP: 144.76.67.162
Game Mode: Death Match
Lives: 0
Max Kills: 15
Version: OpenLieroX 0.58 rc5
Players:
M0rtsHeaven
Modern Warfare1.0 – 20lt
IP: 84.251.82.159
Game Mode: Death Match
Lives: 0
Max Kills: 12
Version: OpenLieroX 0.58 rc5
Players:
Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Down

Author Topic: [BsB] vs [Oz]  (Read 13639 times)

GaO

[BsB] vs [Oz]
« on: December 27, 2009, 11:52:19 am »
Very fine cw, it was me [BsB] SEC , Donky Kong < -- (ex-member) and Muerto.
They had Rose, Vuxor and mr. cokc (aka. nack)
We won their set rifle on lfr with Muertos amazing 2 kills in the end.
We took as our set classic on ff. And they won us easily.
Later on it was time for the neutral set, Rose and mr. cokc vs me and muerto.
Rose was pretty easily out and after that it was we vs Nack. Nack played his best, and successfully got Muerto out. The lives were 0-0 when Soldier did an amazing doomsday hit from speed catching the running Nack and getting the final winning hit.
Yes a really exciting cw  8)
Logged

Michiel

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2009, 02:16:31 pm »
Good Job, I guess:P
as far as I know we didnt beat Oz yet.
Logged

SorZ

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2009, 03:48:31 pm »
That's indeed memorable.
Congratulations Backstreet Boys!

Tyrael

  • You are no one, just like me.
  • LXA Part Time Adapt
  • *****
  • Schwartz: +37/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 472
  • 3106 credits
  • View Inventory
  • Send Money To Tyrael
  • Sometimes things get complicated.
Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2009, 04:06:54 pm »
I think that memorable clanwars section SHOULD have atleast two things:
#1: Two OLD clans, no matter are they dead or not.
#2: Long time since that clan war was held. Two month old clan wouldn't bring many memories to most of the clans or it's members.

If you even bother to check the other memorable clanwars (where are only 2 memorable, due to that those clans are old or are dead, but were good clans.) I'd say that |LaG| versus ~ALT~ and [LCD] versus [pC] were the only memorable to me atleast. ~ALT~ was one of the oldest clans of LX and LaG has been alive for a long time also. [LCD] is more or less the ancestor of -LaB- and [pC] had some of the best players back tthen when the [wc] broke down.

Also check out the Finno-12 versus [wc]. The only reason why it gained so much attention was that it had [wc] on that thread. The cw was a fake as you can see from the screenshots. If you really knew the [wc] dudes, you could remember the skins they used. Also the chat log is a clear sign of [wc] being faked.
Logged

Midnight

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2009, 05:06:12 pm »
Donky Kong, i seee....
Logged
Emma Watson <333

<3

Roxxy~

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2009, 06:22:35 pm »
Read the first comment on second screen. LoL.
Logged

GaO

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2009, 08:34:53 am »
Read the first comment on second screen. LoL.

I don't think you can afford whining -.- cause Nack played and in the neutral when it was 2 vs 1 he was running and camping
Logged

Midnight

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2010, 06:33:56 pm »
Very fine cw, it was me [BsB] SEC , Donky Kong < -- (ex-member) and Muerto.
They had Rose, Vuxor and mr. cokc (aka. nack)
We won their set rifle on lfr with Muertos amazing 2 kills in the end.
We took as our set classic on ff. And they won us easily.
Later on it was time for the neutral set, Rose and mr. cokc vs me and muerto.
Rose was pretty easily out and after that it was we vs Nack. Nack played his best, and successfully got Muerto out. The lives were 0-0 when Soldier did an amazing doomsday hit from speed catching the running Nack and getting the final winning hit.
Yes a really exciting cw  8)

Read the first comment on second screen. LoL.

I don't think you can afford whining -.- cause Nack played and in the neutral when it was 2 vs 1 he was running and camping

Nack is too sexy for u, heh?


And btw u cool guy gao, u aren't such a nice player as u maybe claim to be. U beat Nack OMGOMGOMGMGMG  ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMG

NACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK OMGOMGOMG

Ok?

And btw u holy gao, without donkykong u wouldnt have won. (u know what i mean)
Logged
Emma Watson <333

<3

GaO

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2010, 08:16:11 pm »
y we won and its nothing wrong if he plays he joined our clan and left thats normal u know :d
Logged

Sebbe

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2010, 08:27:47 pm »
Very fine cw, it was me [BsB] SEC , Donky Kong < -- (ex-member) and Muerto.
They had Rose, Vuxor and mr. cokc (aka. nack)
We won their set rifle on lfr with Muertos amazing 2 kills in the end.
We took as our set classic on ff. And they won us easily.
Later on it was time for the neutral set, Rose and mr. cokc vs me and muerto.
Rose was pretty easily out and after that it was we vs Nack. Nack played his best, and successfully got Muerto out. The lives were 0-0 when Soldier did an amazing doomsday hit from speed catching the running Nack and getting the final winning hit.
Yes a really exciting cw  8)

Read the first comment on second screen. LoL.

I don't think you can afford whining -.- cause Nack played and in the neutral when it was 2 vs 1 he was running and camping

Nack is too sexy for u, heh?


And btw u cool guy gao, u aren't such a nice player as u maybe claim to be. U beat Nack OMGOMGOMGMGMG  ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMG

NACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK OMGOMGOMG

Ok?

And btw u holy gao, without donkykong u wouldnt have won. (u know what i mean)

nakcs so greatt
Logged

Hugglebunny

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2010, 08:29:26 pm »
y we won and its nothing wrong if he plays he joined our clan and left thats normal u know :d
NAck is not normal!! He can't even spell his own name right. he does not join your clan, he take it over and kick all. And poff your clan is dead!!

Damit krystal, now i had to write something completely different!
Logged

Captain Nack Sparrow

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2010, 09:09:40 pm »
itw as fake - nakc no lose cw
Logged
nsg

Roxxy~

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #12 on: January 01, 2010, 10:05:54 pm »
Yep, Nack never lose.
Logged

Asrack

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #13 on: January 01, 2010, 10:06:04 pm »
You know, you don't annoy me, but your posts are rather funny Nack. It shows just how pathetic you are.
Logged

Captain Nack Sparrow

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #14 on: January 01, 2010, 10:18:04 pm »
lol ascrack :D:D:DD pathetic :D:D: nack :D:D::DD:
Logged
nsg

Flaw

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #15 on: January 01, 2010, 10:53:38 pm »
Nack hasn't got the "annoying but still cool (overly arrogant) asshole" act together yet, give him time.



Yeah nice cw!
Logged
"I'm a ****ing starship. I'm allowed to cheat." -  The Arbitary

Wooper

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2010, 02:21:36 am »
Yes, he has it.
Logged

Asrack

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2010, 02:39:09 am »
« Last Edit: January 02, 2010, 03:21:01 am by Asrack »
Logged

Cizin

  • Life's a bi*ch, be its pimp.
  • LXA Duracell Postworm
  • ******
  • Schwartz: +136/-12
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 898
  • 3617 credits
  • View Inventory
  • Send Money To Cizin
  • Dnb, Drinks, Women, Porn. Now that's life.
Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2010, 04:40:52 am »
maybe some day in the near future, but so far...
Who is this nack person everybody keeps talking about?
Logged

Wooper

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2010, 01:13:54 pm »
noob no know nakc?
Logged

GaO

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2010, 08:02:26 pm »
Logged

Midnight

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #21 on: January 02, 2010, 08:03:21 pm »
You just don't understand anything.
Logged
Emma Watson <333

<3

GaO

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #22 on: January 02, 2010, 10:20:10 pm »
You just don't understand anything.

Wow and i don't really care we just play for fun  :) and enjoy our games
Logged

Michiel

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2010, 06:53:56 pm »
Wow and i don't really care we just play for fun  :) and enjoy our games

Ok; LOL!
Logged

Hugglebunny

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2010, 07:13:07 pm »
Wow and i don't really care we just play for fun  :) and enjoy our games

Ok; LOL!
It is their kind of fun, you know what i mean. being hated etc etc etc etc etc etc
Logged

Sebbe

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2010, 07:45:24 pm »
Just because you can't accept defeat, you hate them?
Just because a group of ''new players'' (I dunno) won, you'll act like stupid phucks?

If you haven't noticed, they are just being proud of that they accomplished one of their many goals(?), but you wouldn't even accept it but instead try to protect your so called ''pride'' of being a group of turds.

I find this whole shit really pathetic. Seriously, get revenge by re-clanwarring them instead of being re.tarded noobs.
Logged

Michiel

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #26 on: January 03, 2010, 09:24:32 pm »
Like i said  in Aca thread:
They are very annoying because they have to be sure that everyone know that they won from great clans.
1 time is enough. They post every win in the opponents thread
Logged

Erwan

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #27 on: January 04, 2010, 08:11:48 pm »
You just don't understand anything.

Wow and i don't really care we just play for fun  :) and enjoy our games
Yeah well, for once I agree with Midnight.
If you were playing for fun, why care about cws result and if it is mark or not in their thread...
Logged

Tyrael

  • You are no one, just like me.
  • LXA Part Time Adapt
  • *****
  • Schwartz: +37/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 472
  • 3106 credits
  • View Inventory
  • Send Money To Tyrael
  • Sometimes things get complicated.
Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #28 on: January 04, 2010, 09:44:40 pm »
May I ask what's wrong with posting the result to the opponent's thread? Why to keep up the CW statics if you get annoyed if someone posts the results FOR you? It's more or less a reminder to add the CW to the results. Wait couple of weeks and people may ask where's the result and some will go: "wat CW? we never lost 2 u!!!"*
I'd actually be happy if someone posts the CW result (if it took some effor to write it.)


*Idiotic grammar because those makes you only look a like 12 y-o who just learned english somehow and thinks that writing that way will make you look cool
Logged

Michiel

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #29 on: January 04, 2010, 10:48:56 pm »
I dont care. We have played around twice as much cw's than there are posted in our threat
if im right
Logged

GaO

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #30 on: January 05, 2010, 10:28:49 am »
May I ask what's wrong with posting the result to the opponent's thread? Why to keep up the CW statics if you get annoyed if someone posts the results FOR you? It's more or less a reminder to add the CW to the results. Wait couple of weeks and people may ask where's the result and some will go: "wat CW? we never lost 2 u!!!"*
I'd actually be happy if someone posts the CW result (if it took some effor to write it.)


*Idiotic grammar because those makes you only look a like 12 y-o who just learned english somehow and thinks that writing that way will make you look cool

Someone got it  ;), still no-one has marked up their losses to us
Logged

lol

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #31 on: January 05, 2010, 03:10:22 pm »
Maybe cause nobody cares  ???
Logged

Jage

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #32 on: January 05, 2010, 05:15:14 pm »
^ lol
Logged

Rymd

Re: [BsB] vs [Oz]
« Reply #33 on: January 08, 2010, 08:33:35 pm »
offtopic, but some members of [BsB] are assholes.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 10:41:21 pm by Rymd »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Up
 

anything