LX Alliance

Clan related => Clan threads => Topic started by: Rakkula on November 16, 2008, 01:09:40 pm



Title: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on November 16, 2008, 01:09:40 pm
                                                     Death on Arrival
 
Leader
Rakkula aka Blister aka Revo|t aka 0beron aka Thorn aka raG aka Tesla(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5798/finlandep9.gif)

Co-leader(s)
Karmen aka Dinotaur aka Liidu aka *J0k3r!* aka Seifer aka Fucy aka W8Ak47 aka Mr#.@wP aka Jihad Joe aka Cubb(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5798/finlandep9.gif)

Members

Joni(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5798/finlandep9.gif)

-:Currently Recruiting:-

Honorary retired members
magma aka Blake(http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/9447/swedenhd6.gif)

Retired members
Ipa
Erwan
PharaoH
Fr33kill
Lucifer
Sentry
Dirty Motha****a
Jack Black
Seppoo
Joikkeli

Mods played + lt + banned weapons
Modern Warfare 100lt (limited)
Modern Warfare 20lt (mortars only)
Liero v1.0 100lt (limited)
Liero v1.0 20lt (rifles only)
Liero v1.11 100lt (limited)
Shock Air v1.40 100lt (limited)
MSF II 100lt (all weps/limited)
wh40k v0.13 100lt (limited)
Food Fight (Limited)

Levels
Castle Strike
Jukke Dome
Liero Factory (revisited/maintenance/original)
Lamda Bunker
Gamma Complex
Complex
Fossil Facility
Jail Break
Blat Arena

-:Pretty much every map:-

Rules
-Specific game settings must be agreed upon prior to playing (strafe, custom aim etc.)
-Leader controls the clan thread but is otherwise equal to trusted members
-All full members can start a cw, trials may participate
-Have some method of active communication
-Be active

Clanwar results
GG clan wars, Clan wars before the new tag

Year 2008 clan wars:

1. [GG] 1-2 {Q}
2. [GG] 0-2 [NB-AT]
3. [GG] 1-2 ~A~
4. [GG] 0-2 [aR]
5. [GG] 2-0 [Sak]
6. [GG] 1-2 {Q]
7. [GG] 2-0 [aR]
8. [GG] 0-2 [aR]
9. [GG] 2-1 [aR]
10. [GG] 2-0 {Q}
11. [GG] 1-2 {Q}
12. [GG] 2-1  {Q}
13. [GG] 2-0 [aR]
14. [GG] 2-0 [aR]
15. [GG] 0-2 {Q}
16. [GG] 0-2 {Q}
17. [GG] 0-2 {Q]
18. [GG] 0-2 {Q}
19. [GG] 1-2 {Q}
20. [GG] 2-0 [aR]
21. [GG] 2-0 [aR]
22. [GG] 2-1 {Q}
23. [GG] 2-0 {Q}
24. [GG] 2-0 [NB-AT]
25. [GG] 0-2 [NB-AT]
26. [GG] 2-0 [FoH]
27. [GG] 2-0 [aR]
28. [GG] 2-1 [pFe]
29. [GG] 2-0 [NB-AT]
30. [GG] 2-1 [Emp]
31. [GG] 2-0 [Emp]
32. [GG] 2-1 [Emp]
33. [GG] 0-2 [NB-AT]
34. [GG] 1-2 ~A~
35. [GG] 2-1 {Q}
36. [GG] 2-0 ~A~
37. [GG] 2-1 {Q}
38. [GG] 1-2 {Q}
39. [GG] 0-2 {Q}
40. [GG] 0-2 {Q}
41. [GG] 2-1 [NG]
42. [GG] 1-2 {Q}
43. [GG] 2-1 {Q}
44. [GG] 2-0 [Emp]

Year 2009 clan wars:

1. [GG] 2-0 [M80]
2. [GG] 2-0 [M80]
3. [GG] 0-2 ~A~
4. [GG] 1-2 ~A~
5. [GG] 1-2 ~A~
6. [GG] 2-0 [Sak]
7. [GG] 2-0 [Sak]
8. [GG] 1-2 [WvW]
9. [GG] 0-2 [WvW]
10. [GG] 0-2 {Q}
11. [GG] 2-1 {Q}
12. [GG] 2-0 {Q}
13. [GG] 2-0 {Q}
14. [GG] 2-1 {Q}

Wins 33, Losses 25
Win/lose ratio: 1.32

[DoA] Clan wars, clan wars after changing the tag

1. [DoA] 2-0 [Sn]
2. [DoA] 2-0 {Q}
3. [DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
4. [DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
5. [DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
6. [DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
7. [DoA] 0-2 [Osp]
8. [DoA] 1-2 ~A~
9. [DoA] 1-2 [WvW]
10. [DoA] 1-2 ~A~
11. [DoA] 2-0 [aR]
12. [DoA] 1-1 [aR]
13. [DoA] 1-2 {Q}
14. [DoA] 2-1 {Q}
15. [DoA] 2-0 {Q}
16. [DoA] 1-2 ~A~
17. [DoA] 0-2 {Q}
18. [DoA] 2-0 ~A~
19. [DoA] 0-2 {Q}
20. [DoA] 2-0 {Q}
21. [DoA] 0-2 [T3]
22. [DoA] 2-0 UTI
23. [DoA] 2-0 UTI
24. [DoA] 0-2 [Sn]
25. [DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
26. [DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
27. [DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
28. [DoA] 2-0 [Sn]
29. [DoA] 1-2 {Q}
30. [DoA] 2-0 [Sn]
31. [DoA] 2-0 .Cp
32. [DoA] 2-0 .Cp
33. [DoA] 2-0 .Cp
34. [DoA] 2-0 {Q}
35. [DoA] 0-2 {Q}
36. [DoA] 1-2 {Q}
37. [DoA] 0-2 {Q}
38. [DoA] 2-1 {Q}
39. [DoA] 2-0 {Q}
40. [DoA] 2-1 {Q}
41. [DoA] 2-0 [R]
42. [DoA] 2-0 |LaG|
43. [DoA] 2-1 [Osp]
44. [DoA] 2-1 {Q}
45. [DoA] 1-2 ~A~
46. [DoA] 2-1 {Q}
47. [DoA] 0-2 [Sn]
48. [DoA] 2-0 [T3]
49. [DoA] 2-1 [Sn]
50. [DoA] 0-2 [WvW]
51. [DoA] 1-2 {Q}
52. [DoA] 0-2 {Q}
53. [DoA] 0-2 .Cp
54. [DoA] 2-0 [xD]
55. [DoA] 2-0 [xD]
56. [DoA] 2-0 [Sak]
57. [DoA] 2-1 {Q}
58. [DoA] 2-1 [Osp]
59. [DoA] 2-1 [T3]
60. [DoA] 2-1 ~A~
61. [DoA] 2-0 {Q}
62. [DoA] 2-1 {Q}
63. [DoA] 2-0 [Sn]
64. [DoA] 2-1 |LaG|
65. [DoA] 2-0 ~A~
66. [DoA] 2-1 ~A~
67. [DoA] 0-2 [WvW]
68. [DoA] 2-0 [xD]
69. [DoA] 2-0 [xD]
70. [DoA] 2-0 {Q}
71. [DoA] 2-1 ~A~
72. [DoA] 3-2 [Sn]
73. [DoA] 1-2 [WvW]
74. [DoA] 2-0 [T3]
75. [DoA] 1-2 {Q}
76. [DoA] 0-2 {Q}
77. [DoA] 1-2 {Q}
78. [DoA] 2-0 [NoM]
79. [DoA] 2-0 [NoM]
80. [DoA] 2-1 [aC]
81. [DoA] 2-0 [AoW]
82. [DoA] 2-1 [NoM]
83. [DoA] 2-1 [aC]
84. [DoA] 1-2 [aC]
85. [DoA] 0-2 [NoM]
86. [DoA] 2-1 [NoM]
87. [DoA] 2-0 [TES IV]
88. [DoA] 2-0 [Sn]
89. [DoA] 0-2 [vB]
90. [DoA] 1-2 [Axe]
91. [DoA] 1-2 [BB]
92. [DoA] 0-2 [BB]
93. [DoA] 2-1 [AoG]
94. [DoA] 2-1 [BANG]

Wins 61, Loses 32, unfinished/aborted 1
Win percentage: 67%

[DoA] Clan Wars: 2nd era
1. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
2. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
3. [DoA] 2-1 [aC]
4. [DoA] 0-2 [MoM]
5. [DoA] 1-2 [MoM]
6.[DoA] 1-2 [MoM]
7. [DoA] 2-1 [MoM]
8. [DoA] 2-1 [aC]
9. [DoA] 2-0 [aC]
10. [DoA] 2-1 [MoM]
11. [DoA] 2-0 [Str8]
12. [DoA] 1-1 [aC]
13. [DoA] 2-0 [aC]
14. [DoA] 2-0 [The]
15. [DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
16. [DoA] 1-2 [aC]
17. [DoA] 2-0 [Cop]
18. [DoA] 2-0 [Cop]
19. [DoA] 1-2 [aC]
20. [DoA] 1-2 [aC]
21. [DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
22. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
23. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
24. [DoA] 2-1 [Osp]
25. [DoA] 2-0 [nGu]
26. [DoA] 2-1 [nGu]
27. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
28. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
29. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
30. [DoA] 0-2 [aC]
31. [DoA] 1-2 [aC]
32. [DoA] 2-0 [nGu]
33. [DoA] 2-0 [nGu]
34. [DoA] 2-0 [nGu]
35. [DoA] 2-0 -MF-
36. [DoA] 2-0 -MF-
37. [DoA] 0-2 [Oe]
38. [DoA] 1-2 [Oe]
39. [DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
40. [DoA] 2-0 [BP]
41. [DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
42. [DoA] 2-0 [Wol]

Wins 24, Losses 17, unfinished/aborted 1


Website
LXA for will be our clansite for the time being

Contact
I can be contacted through LXA by a private message. I visit LXA almost every day.



Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: RuNyoufool on November 16, 2008, 07:40:01 pm
Welcome to LXA GG!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on November 16, 2008, 07:58:50 pm
welcome, gg! :D
You can edit your first post by pressing the modify button, but you probably knew that anyway. And i love your name :D GO GARLIC!!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on November 16, 2008, 08:10:12 pm
Hey good that you made your way in here.
Have fun and don't give up too early. Cya in game


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on November 16, 2008, 08:14:56 pm
Thx for all commets. We'll try cw as much as we can but before we can really start working properly we have to finish our recruit. It's been on for 4 days now but we've only found 2 suitable members  :-\


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Laku on November 16, 2008, 08:46:50 pm
Welcome and Good luck GG.
Be strong :D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on November 16, 2008, 09:14:15 pm


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on November 16, 2008, 09:57:57 pm
Nice name! :D Good luck and hope you guys stay around.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Asrack on November 16, 2008, 10:16:34 pm
Welcome to LXA.

Name reminds me of [GC]. Tizzle and Gigolo.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on November 27, 2008, 04:56:12 pm
Dinotaur is now a GG member. cw agains [NB-AT] 0-2  :-\

Dirty Motha****a is now a trial member


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 04, 2008, 06:08:54 pm
[GG] 2-0 [Sak] First win w00t!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 04, 2008, 06:10:09 pm
why do you never post if you loose against us? =(


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 04, 2008, 06:12:27 pm
why do you never post if you loose against us? =(
What? I did, didn't I. The one above Sak  :-\


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 04, 2008, 06:14:03 pm
uhm where?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 04, 2008, 06:15:16 pm
[GG] 0-2 [aR]
[GG] 2-0 [Sak]
Like...here


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 04, 2008, 06:20:37 pm
okay  ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 04, 2008, 06:57:36 pm
when did Sak lose to GG?-.-


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on December 04, 2008, 07:07:56 pm
when did Sak lose to GG?-.-

Just now, why weren't you there to save us? :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 04, 2008, 08:10:28 pm
[GG] 1-2 {Q}  :-\ Well...good games. And I just found out that Thor is almost a tolerable person once you get to know him.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Calvi on December 04, 2008, 08:40:46 pm
It seems you are missing the information, so I just wanted to inform you that Erwan is french.

Good luck with your clan  ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 04, 2008, 08:44:54 pm
Thor is almost a tolerable person once you get to know him.
Well put, almost but not quite.

http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=542

Check this out! (http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=542)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 04, 2008, 09:01:34 pm
It seems you are missing the information, so I just wanted to inform you that Erwan is french.

Good luck with your clan  ;)
Thanks. And I know Erwan is French, I just can't find a flag  ;)

Crap archive:

http://lxalliance.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=sendmoney2



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW_pglxCtng (http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=sendmoney2)

http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=sendmoney2




http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=691

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW_pglxCtng (http://lxalliance.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=389)

Quote from: Sakmongkol
with some other than program than Paint.
..Mistake!

http://lxalliance.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=389

 this file (http://openlierox.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openlierox/share/gamedir/music/Ouverture.mp3)

http://lxalliance.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=394 (http://Hoho)

Screens:
[img=http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/417/lierox240.th.png] (http://img22.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox240.png)

[img=http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1538/lierox241.th.png] (http://img22.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox241.png)

http://lxalliance.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=404

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6-e1Ze_ATg (http://lxalliance.net/forum/index.php?action=shop;do=trade_buy;id=404)

An arab at the Airport:
- Name?
- Abdul al-Rhazib.
- Sex?
- Three to five times a week.
- No, no...I mean male or female?
- Male, female, sometimes camel.
- Holy Cow!
- Yes, cow, sheep, animals in general.
- But isn't that hostile?
- Horse style, doggy style, any style!
- Oh dear!
- No, no! Deer run too fast...

To make things clear, magma left because I haven't been able to, due to connection issues, play for the last 1 or 2 months. Freekill left because of my recommendation...

 Sakmongkol: As you wish, it's a free world.
(22:37:47) Rakkula: No it's not... there's no absolute freedom. You might be referring to relative freedom though
(22:37:47) Sakmongkol: All right, I admit it was a mistake to comment ili's 'halirous' video in any way.
(22:37:56) Sakmongkol: My apologies.
(22:38:17) Rakkula: So you made a mistake? That's in huge conflict with some of you other comments :P
(22:38:32) iliera: You make mistakes all the time, saying things you shouldn't say.
(22:38:32) Rakkula: your*
(22:38:36) Sakmongkol: Like which comment?
(22:39:39) Rakkula: Where's all the flaming? You're boring me...
(22:40:15) Rakkula: I bet he's scrolling to find some of those comments, Monco :D
(22:40:21) iliera: http://lxal​liance.net/f​orum/index.p​hp/topic,685​6.4460.html
(22:40:30) Rakkula: knew it!
(22:40:31) iliera: It was funny how you didn't post in that topic for some time after my post.
(22:41:01) iliera: If you wouldn't try to make me fail all the time, you would fail less, Moncoboy.
(22:41:40) Sakmongkol: Hmm, 'the hippie movement died in the 70s'? That's a fact, not a mistake.
(22:42:00) iliera: Wow are you trying to act stupid now?
(22:42:09) iliera: Try better, sorry.
(22:42:13) Sakmongkol: Not necessarily​.
(22:42:19) iliera: But you are!
(22:42:24) iliera: Try again with the link, please.
(22:42:34) Sakmongkol: I just didn't see which particular post you were referring to.
(22:42:54) iliera: Where i say "The next poster didn't get owned as bad as Sakmongkol did."
(22:43:09) iliera: You can use ctrl+f to find the following sentence.
(22:43:10) Sakmongkol: By the way, don't use 'if' and 'would' in the same clause or I'm not going to argue with you.
(22:43:15) iliera: I hope you can do THAT.
(22:43:29) iliera: So you are going back to stupid basics.
(22:43:49) iliera: That's a typical finnish.
(22:43:52) Sakmongkol: Iliera, in your example of a
(22:43:58) iliera: Stubborn enough not to admit mistakes.
(22:44:06) Rakkula: Grammar facist :E
(22:44:14) iliera: Making you look even worser in my eyes.
(22:44:19) Sakmongkol: 'mistake' there I used the word 'one' simply as a substitute for 'poster'.
(22:44:24) iliera: Maybe in Finland, not admitting mistakes is cool

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

http://www.riemurasia.net/jylppy/media.php?id=69221&c=5

Only a fractional minority are in ideal situation when it comes to genes. Someone always has the advantage ,yet its all about dedication. If you consider yourself a victim of the genetics, its your decision whether  to give more to get the same results than someone else or just complain about genetics.
I never disagreed with you on this one. But there are still limitations resulting from genes.
Besides, i was rather talking about gaining muscle, not only gaining weight.
I'm talking about affecting in your body in general.
And what the hell is asymptote?
Umm... forget that. What I was implying is something like this:

Muscle mass(absolute)/Muscle mass(max)=
(Level of workout) / [(Level of workout) + (Genetical factor)]
....
wat?

It's simply a curve that approaches maximum muscle mass but it never reaches it. Muscle mass(max) is determined by genes and Genetical factor is the estimation of other genetical factors.



Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: RussG on December 04, 2008, 10:19:56 pm
Welcomized.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Flare on December 04, 2008, 10:21:52 pm

[GG] 2-1 ~A~


It is 1-2, not 2-1.

And welcome.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 05, 2008, 01:20:00 am
ah i would have only made it worser(1-4)
but ya,forgot to
welcome


and i know that making topics all the time of different clans is cool(and raises activity)
but sometimes people should stay in the same clan,to get better known etc
i'm not sure if you are one of those guys who makes new clan every month
but yah,if u are,then better stay with GG for long time


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 05, 2008, 12:49:47 pm
It is 1-2, not 2-1.
Whups, typing mistake. At least the colour was right.
i'm not sure if you are one of those guys who makes new clan every month,but yah,if u are,then better stay with GG for long time
I'm not. I've only been to one clan before and it sucked arse, so I left and decided to a new one with a few friends


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 05, 2008, 04:54:13 pm
3 cws agains aR 2-0, 0-2, 2-1


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Freak on December 05, 2008, 05:48:56 pm
3 cws agains aR 2-0, 0-2, 2-1
These rounds were pretty fun. =)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 06, 2008, 07:25:16 pm
I added most of Dino's names in the first post in the hope that his name(s) won't cause any more trouble. So now you all know  :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Freak on December 06, 2008, 07:38:30 pm
I think you listed all names he ever used. =P
Btw Erwan comes from France, (http://www.nationalflaggen.de/images/flaggen/flagge-frankreich-flagge-rechteckig-12x18.gif).


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 06, 2008, 07:40:55 pm
Thanks for the flag Edit2: It still doesn't really match the other flags though
Edit: Woot, I'm a lurker now. Finally got those 50 posts


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on December 06, 2008, 07:42:46 pm
=)


Yes i know my name u_u


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on December 06, 2008, 08:26:45 pm
New Cw ;
players : {Q} Lodur {Q} Laku {G} Jage Vs [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen.

[GG] won 2-0
 
1 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Laku {Q} Jage (Wh40k)      [GG] Won  [GG] 1-0 {Q}
2 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Lodur {Q} Jage (Mortars)      [GG] Won [GG] 2-0 {Q}


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 06, 2008, 08:31:12 pm
who choosed which setting?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Freak on December 06, 2008, 08:34:25 pm
who choosed which setting?
who cares?
They chose Mortars ofc.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 07, 2008, 10:51:12 am
New Cw ;
players : {Q} Lodur {Q} Laku {G} Jage Vs [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen.

[GG] won 2-0
 
1 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Laku {Q} Jage (Wh40k)      [GG] Won  [GG] 1-0 {Q}
2 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Lodur {Q} Jage (Mortars)      [GG] Won [GG] 2-0 {Q}
:o Good job.

Joikkeli has been kicked out or he left himself. I don't know and I don't care. The point being that he's no longer in GG due to many reasons


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jage on December 07, 2008, 10:51:32 am
{Q} vs [GG] 2-1
Jage     Karmen
Laku     Euwan
Lodur   someone

Classic    Wh40k
Classic
Post this one too.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Freak on December 07, 2008, 11:02:52 am
New Cw ;
players : {Q} Lodur {Q} Laku {G} Jage Vs [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen.

[GG] won 2-0
 
1 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Laku {Q} Jage (Wh40k)      [GG] Won  [GG] 1-0 {Q}
2 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Lodur {Q} Jage (Mortars)      [GG] Won [GG] 2-0 {Q}
:o Good job.

Joikkeli has been kicked out or he left himself. I don't know and I don't care. The point being that he's no longer in GG due to many reasons
He was one of the leaders, how can you kick him?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on December 07, 2008, 11:04:42 am
New Cw ;
players : {Q} Lodur {Q} Laku {G} Jage Vs [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen.

[GG] won 2-0
 
1 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Laku {Q} Jage (Wh40k)      [GG] Won  [GG] 1-0 {Q}
2 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Lodur {Q} Jage (Mortars)      [GG] Won [GG] 2-0 {Q}
:o Good job.

Joikkeli has been kicked out or he left himself. I don't know and I don't care. The point being that he's no longer in GG due to many reasons
He was one of the leaders, how can you kick him?
Maybe the clan voted him out  :-X and why you kicked him?? It is always a resond


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on December 07, 2008, 11:58:42 am
New Cw ;
players : {Q} Lodur {Q} Laku {G} Jage Vs [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen.

[GG] won 2-0
 
1 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Laku {Q} Jage (Wh40k)      [GG] Won  [GG] 1-0 {Q}
2 game : [GG] Erwan [GG] Karmen. vs {Q} Lodur {Q} Jage (Mortars)      [GG] Won [GG] 2-0 {Q}
:o Good job.

Joikkeli has been kicked out or he left himself. I don't know and I don't care. The point being that he's no longer in GG due to many reasons
He was one of the leaders, how can you kick him?
Maybe the clan voted him out  :-X and why you kicked him?? It is always a resond

Well.. that dude made me angry yesterday when we was playing cw vs. Q. We won first round with erwan (as always)  ::). then that superman came and wanted to play classic. In the middle of round he told us that     <message type="CHAT" text="[GG] Joikkeli: oon perustaja mutta en halua olla GG SSa niin lahen" /> (Im the founder of GG but i dont want to be in GG anymore so i'll leave)
after the second match he said:     <message type="CHAT" text="[GG] Joikkeli: tulen kohta takaisin" /> (I'll be back) then he wanted to join without GG tag. So that told me enough he isnt in anymore :)


Fixed your quote /Hatten


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jage on December 07, 2008, 12:03:15 pm
Actually he played in the wh round.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on December 07, 2008, 12:05:12 pm
Oo Joikkeli play in 2nd clanwar; in WH40K and he leave ....

(Joikkeli (no GG) Send i want to join message)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on December 07, 2008, 12:13:15 pm
Me and my quotes rofl.  ;D well yes he did but he played a well and was normal human in the beginning


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 07, 2008, 12:16:27 pm
{Q} vs [GG] 2-1
Jage     Karmen
Laku     Euwan
Lodur   someone

Classic    Wh40k
Classic
Post this one too.
I already did. It's the last one in the list


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 07, 2008, 07:35:42 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q} Hohhohhoo! We will soon have wl ratio of 1. Then we're ready to take over the world.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on December 07, 2008, 07:40:51 pm
Ns cw :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 11, 2008, 04:32:45 pm
[aR] Louie: AWW MORO
[aR] Louie has left
 
Yeah. [GG] 1-0 [aR]. Game not finished yet because Loui left. However, we don't know why. he just said bye and left.  ;D So there was no obvious reason for leaving. Game is yet to be finished then.

Lives were

Rakkula 3
Karmen 2
Manu 2
Louis 2


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 11, 2008, 04:49:18 pm
[aR] Louie: AWW MORO
[aR] Louie has left
 
Yeah. [GG] 1-0 [aR]. Game not finished yet because Loui left. However, we don't know why. he just said bye and left.  ;D So there was no obvious reason for leaving. Game is yet to be finished then.

Lives were

Rakkula 3
Karmen 2
Manu 2
Louis 2
Was it the first round or the second one?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 11, 2008, 04:59:45 pm
Was it the first round or the second one?
It was the second round. We won the first round, so it's 1-0 now
Edit: Nack, would you mind asking Louis why he left during a cw?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 11, 2008, 07:53:33 pm
[GG] 2-0 [aR]
[GG] 2-0 [aR]
Good games!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 11, 2008, 08:16:03 pm
Was it the first round or the second one?
It was the second round. We won the first round, so it's 1-0 now
Edit: Nack, would you mind asking Louis why he left during a cw?
I will talk to him as we face next time.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 13, 2008, 02:34:33 pm
[GG] 0-2 {Q} Bah. We sucked. I got more postcount!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on December 14, 2008, 12:57:01 pm
New member? (Seppo)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 14, 2008, 01:39:57 pm
New member? (Seppo)
What? I took him on trial but removed him from the list because I haven't seen him around. Did you see him?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on December 14, 2008, 02:14:09 pm
Yes I have seen him


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 14, 2008, 06:24:23 pm
[GG] 0-2 {Q} For ****'s sake... I'm pissed now.  >:( :-\ :'(


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on December 14, 2008, 09:08:09 pm
hehe take it easy rakk, it's just for fun =)
+ Q is a good clan, it's no shame to loose vs them ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 15, 2008, 08:03:10 pm
[GG] 0-2 {Q} Times 3 + [GG] 1-2 {Q} or something like that. I wrote them right in the first post (maybe  ;))

GGs


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 16, 2008, 02:27:53 pm
By a mutual agreement with Jack Black we've chosen to kick Erwan out of [GG]. Erwan didn't really fit in so that's it then.  :( :-\ :'(
Moreover, I couldn't find a flag which would match with the rest.

We need more recruits! Btw I love Kjack <3<3  :P (Who's clanless atm)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: TeddyKGB on December 16, 2008, 02:33:25 pm
Kjack is not that clanless


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 16, 2008, 02:34:23 pm
Kjack is not that clanless
Goddamit!  >:(


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: 'KJack.mp3 on December 16, 2008, 02:51:09 pm
Sorrey mate :). thanks for the love though ^_^


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on December 16, 2008, 02:52:14 pm
Sorrey mate :). thanks for the love though ^_^
what clan are you in then?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: 'KJack.mp3 on December 16, 2008, 02:54:21 pm
[Cop] :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 16, 2008, 02:59:39 pm
Sorrey mate :). thanks for the love though ^_^
I was just licking your arse  :D
[Cop] :)
Did Cop recruit you after I saw you without a clan tag?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: 'KJack.mp3 on December 16, 2008, 03:02:18 pm
From what I understand they have tryed to recruit me for some time ^^, and I know some of the people in Cop so its a good choise for me


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 16, 2008, 04:33:54 pm
[GG] 2-0 [aR]
[GG] 1-0 [aR] Yet to be finished

Good games!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 16, 2008, 06:17:14 pm
Who played in those clan wars?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 16, 2008, 07:05:09 pm
Who played in those clan wars?
Slimmer and O"Neill

[GG] 2-1 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
Good games again. Q got pretty pissed though  ;D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 16, 2008, 07:15:47 pm
I got an idea for you to stay on the track.

First, start play Final Fantasy, then merge up with ~A~. Then you guys have made a new clan called [AR] - Advanced Runners.

What do you mean with it's useless to tell you that this clan really fails? Is it ''useless'' to talk about the truth or something?

I don't know you either Nack, I only knows that you've ****ed things up in this clan, which had a really good potential, when the leaders still was in it. You could've played just like them, don't giving a **** about how the winning percent of all your clanwars gone. But you decided not to, and then starts to play ftw, and makes life harder for yourself.

Compare [aR] to the really big clans, such as [Osp], [AoG], [RIP] and so on. I can say that your clan is just a little piece of shit compared to these. But I assume you're comparing yourself to [FoH] and ~A~? Running will take you to hell. Get used to it.

Now, I'm going to leave you. Don't expect me to response anything to your dumb counters. Just get used to the truth. I'm done here.


*Labla...ow wait! Aegir out!
Once these words were used against me.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 16, 2008, 07:17:35 pm
Ummm.....okay. Nice message. What's the point? What does this have to do with GG or me?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 16, 2008, 07:26:06 pm
Once these words were used against me.
I'll be happy to use them against you.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 16, 2008, 07:26:31 pm
I deleted some pretty offensive messages from here.

Lodur, I hope at least you would have the brains to stop that whine. I will let you talk about this subject on this thread providing you're not offensive.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Johnnyy on December 16, 2008, 07:38:23 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
Good games again. Q got pretty pissed though  ;D

Who played in those cws?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Cizin on December 16, 2008, 07:42:34 pm
Me
Laku
Lodur


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on December 16, 2008, 08:55:59 pm
Bye  :(


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Johnnyy on December 16, 2008, 10:03:29 pm
Cya


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on December 16, 2008, 10:09:52 pm
bye erwan :-\
i hope you'll find another clan soon, and get new friends there :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 17, 2008, 02:14:53 pm
Maybe I should change my name. Rakkula is a Finnish word and not all understand this. If I'd simply translate this into English? Rakkula=Blister. Sounds okay, huh? Al though I'm guessing even fewer people understand the translation  :-\


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 17, 2008, 02:33:52 pm
Ehm.. do you kick him or does he leave?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on December 17, 2008, 02:53:50 pm
By a mutual agreement with Jack Black we've chosen to kick Erwan out of [GG]. Erwan didn't really fit in so that's it then.  :( :-\ :'(
i guess they kicked him out  :-\


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 17, 2008, 02:55:17 pm
Ehm.. do you kick him or does he leave?
You mean did we kick Erwan or did he leave? Well it was a mutual decision by Jack and I. There were many resons for kicking him.
        First of all, I don't think that GG is the right clan for him, because he's a dedicated morts player and GG plays all mods. Here we come to the question whether he joined GG just for the lack of a clan or if he actually wanted to join a multimod clan. Erwan has improved quite a lot in other mods aswell though and thus I'm willing to take him back if/when he learns to like them or has improved considerably in them. So the main reason was in the differences of the mods we like to play.
       In my opinion Erwan isn't a poor player. He has potential but I believe that GG doesn't suit him as a clan. Of course we mind have banned him temporaly from clan wars but I doubt if it had eny effect in the reason I brought up in the first sentence of the last paragraph.
      Moreover we had some issues understanding one another  :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on December 17, 2008, 06:03:57 pm
Ehm.. do you kick him or does he leave?
You mean did we kick Erwan or did he leave? Well it was a mutual decision by Jack and I. There were many resons for kicking him.
        First of all, I don't think that GG is the right clan for him, because he's a dedicated morts player and GG plays all mods. Here we come to the question whether he joined GG just for the lack of a clan or if he actually wanted to join a multimod clan. Erwan has improved quite a lot in other mods aswell though and thus I'm willing to take him back if/when he learns to like them or has improved considerably in them. So the main reason was in the differences of the mods we like to play.
       In my opinion Erwan isn't a poor player. He has potential but I believe that GG doesn't suit him as a clan. Of course we mind have banned him temporaly from clan wars but I doubt if it had eny effect in the reason I brought up in the first sentence of the last paragraph.
      Moreover we had some issues understanding one another  :P
Hehe thats so true, its hard to teach that dude and say in cw's whats best to do cuz most used word was what? :D he was nice person thats true maybe possibles to come back  :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 17, 2008, 07:18:23 pm
[GG] 2-0 [NB-AT]
[GG] 0-2 [NB-AT]

Good games


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Joonazz on December 18, 2008, 09:10:50 am
thanks for games, did you take a rematch right after the first one yesterday? Nice that we got a revenge ;D

And + to Seppoo-guy, His playing was indeed impressive 8)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 19, 2008, 12:47:38 am
I gave you your + karma as promised Rak.


Title: Re: Quality Jr. - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 19, 2008, 11:48:47 am
You are now officially renamed to {Q} Jr.

Everyone is free to interpret that however they want.

Bah doubleposting.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 19, 2008, 12:39:37 pm
Well thank you Griffin.

[GG] 2-0 [FoH]
FoH is lame. They forfeit by leaving the game during the cw without any explanation. Fair win for us.
First round with liero v1.0 100lt against FoH, we won. Second round with rifles was aborted by FoH simply leaving the cw.  ;D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: joni on December 19, 2008, 12:44:46 pm
FoH is lame.

It seems that you know now the first Rule of the lxa.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on December 19, 2008, 12:46:17 pm
1. foh is not fair
2. foh didnt lose that clanwar
3. greetings from Thailand
4. r4mbake wants pojotin


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 19, 2008, 03:54:22 pm
[GG] 2-0 [aR] This was unfinished so it's finished now
[GG] 2-0 [aR]

Good games!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 19, 2008, 04:56:16 pm
[GG] 2-1 [pFe] Really good game. Tight in the end and [pFe] gave a bigger challenge than we expected
 :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 19, 2008, 04:58:44 pm
Tight in the end and [pFe] gave a bigger challenge than we expected
They know how to run, camp and spam too!?

Note: This is to Rakkula, if you're not him what I said is none of your business.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 19, 2008, 05:00:46 pm
Lol Griffin. It was a really fair game. Not much camp, run nor spam on either side. Although right lower corner of lfr was still used  :D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 19, 2008, 05:05:29 pm
Lol Griffin. It was a really fair game. Not much camp, run nor spam on either side. Although right lower corner of lfr was still used  :D
I'm just teasing you :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 19, 2008, 05:07:14 pm
Lol Griffin. It was a really fair game. Not much camp, run nor spam on either side. Although right lower corner of lfr was still used  :D
I'm just teasing you :)
I noticed. We both also get post count for this. The bigger the post count, the bigger the virtual penis  :D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 19, 2008, 05:10:45 pm
Who needs a big virtual one? (Don't even think about saying me!!  >:()

Aaaanyway, I'll stop spamming up the place.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: r4mbake on December 19, 2008, 06:35:21 pm
1. foh is not fair
2. foh didnt lose that clanwar
3. greetings from Thailand
4. r4mbake wants pojotin
I cant w8 untill it is 2.00-4.00 and ill write soooo much bad about GG and u rakkula :)

* I dont know why I quoted thors post, i liked it


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 19, 2008, 06:42:53 pm
I cant w8 untill it is 2.00-4.00 and ill write soooo much bad about GG and u rakkula :)
Lol?

[GG] 2-0 [NB-AT] Good games, pretty tight ones aswell


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 20, 2008, 05:39:26 pm
[GG] 2-1 [Emp] Good games. Karmen, Blister versus Erwan and someone whose name I won't bother to write down.

It's also nice to see that Erwan found/rejoined a clan he likes to be in.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 22, 2008, 12:13:34 pm
[GG] 2-0 [Emp]
[GG] 2-1 [Emp] Good games. They had no change :P

Our cw list is starting to look rather green

Edit: [GG] 0-2 [NB-AT]


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: joni on December 22, 2008, 04:43:49 pm
[GG] 2-0 [NB-AT] Good games, pretty tight ones aswell

I want screenshots!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on December 22, 2008, 05:47:01 pm
So do i :) maybe rakkula would check it out later, btw our todays cw's we failed 0-2 and won Q 2-1


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Flare on December 22, 2008, 06:30:34 pm
So do i :) maybe rakkula would check it out later, btw our todays cw's we failed 0-2 and won Q 2-1

You "failed" for ~A~ 1-2 also.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 22, 2008, 08:08:03 pm
[GG] 2-0 [NB-AT] Good games, pretty tight ones aswell
I want screenshots!
You don't belive me? Just explain how to upload those pics first  :-[

I updated clan war list


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on December 22, 2008, 08:12:16 pm
[GG] 2-0 [NB-AT] Good games, pretty tight ones aswell
I want screenshots!
You don't belive me? Just explain how to upload those pics first  :-[

I updated clan war list
Wut.

[GG] 2-0 [Emp]
[GG] 2-1 [Emp] Good games. They had no change :P

Our cw list is starting to look rather green

Edit: [GG] 0-2 [NB-AT]
Did you forget you edited it? Or am I missing something?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 22, 2008, 08:14:28 pm
No Steelcrush, those are separate clan wars. Check the first post. We've had 5 cws against [NB-AT] and we won 2 of them, lost 3


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on December 22, 2008, 08:15:46 pm
No Steelcrush, those are separate clan wars. Check the first post. We've had 5 cws against [NB-AT] and we won 2 of them, lost 3
Ok, kinda thought so.  :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: joni on December 23, 2008, 12:10:26 pm
You can upload screenshots to: www.imageshack.us


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on December 23, 2008, 01:59:48 pm
WELCOME NELLI  :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: ONeill on December 23, 2008, 02:09:49 pm
THX KARMEN  ;D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 23, 2008, 02:22:06 pm
O"Neill is now a trial member.

[GG] 2-0 ~A~ Good games. Laughed a lot  ;D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on December 23, 2008, 03:14:54 pm
Can I ask why did you laugh. Just curious because A was the clan you were playing against. xd

It indeed is sometimes funny to play against them, but they are cool guys.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 23, 2008, 03:32:29 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q} Good games. Tight ones aswell

Can I ask why did you laugh. Just curious because A was the clan you were playing against. xd

It indeed is sometimes funny to play against them, but they are cool guys.
Err...I can only remember laughing a lot.

Oh yeah! We had some Server-sided health issues.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on December 23, 2008, 03:49:48 pm
some one confirme that O'neill is retierd please.  Or not....


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: ONeill on December 23, 2008, 04:26:09 pm
I tried, but couldnt retire and i and nack are good for reitiring and stopping that and joining GG as trial.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on December 23, 2008, 05:07:02 pm
I tried, but couldnt retire and i and nack are good for reitiring and stopping that and joining GG as trial.

Well at least change your personal text.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: ONeill on December 23, 2008, 05:33:11 pm
I tried, but couldnt retire and i and nack are good for reitiring and stopping that and joining GG as trial.

Well at least change your personal text.
Hah didn't u like it?  8)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on December 23, 2008, 05:36:27 pm
I tried, but couldnt retire and i and nack are good for reitiring and stopping that and joining GG as trial.

Well at least change your personal text.
Hah didn't u like it?  8)
Could sak maybe talk about
 <-------- [aR] O'neill as it stand right there? well ofc at your profile


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 23, 2008, 07:37:26 pm
[GG] 1-2 {Q} Good games, al though the last round sucked due to lag


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jage on December 23, 2008, 07:50:49 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q} Good games, al though the last round sucked due to lag
We won that one. Sorry.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 24, 2008, 09:09:58 am
We won that one. Sorry.
Whups. My bad. Sorry


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: ONeill on December 24, 2008, 11:03:37 am
I tried, but couldnt retire and i and nack are good for reitiring and stopping that and joining GG as trial.

Well at least change your personal text.
Hah didn't u like it?  8)
Could sak maybe talk about
 <-------- [aR] O'neill as it stand right there? well ofc at your profile
Oh thx I forgot it :/


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 24, 2008, 12:45:21 pm
[GG] 0-2 {Q} No comments

Edit: Seppoo is now a full member


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 24, 2008, 07:28:07 pm
I will travel to Ivalo for a vacation. Will be back in 5 days.

While I'm gone Jack and Karmen will do my job. Karmen now has the right to recuit players as trials but promotions to full members are decided by Jack and I (by this I mean me alone :D). Reasons for my decision are based on his activity and accomplishments in the clan.

Cya after 5 days (or 6 (or 7))

And merry Christmas

Edit: Post all new trials to this thread. This also means all clan wars. I'll update the first post asap.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Johnnyy on December 24, 2008, 08:05:50 pm
Cya have fun in Ivalo ;D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on December 25, 2008, 04:36:52 pm
phaild to Q

[GG] 0-2 {Q} awsome. first game was so close.. :) just think we have train more before attacking against Q


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 25, 2008, 05:15:38 pm
congrats,it's your first win,karmen tho don't overreact with attacking -.-


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Johnnyy on December 25, 2008, 05:22:22 pm
phaild to Q

[GG] 0-2 {Q} awsome. first game was so close.. :) just think we have train more before attacking against Q

Yeah pretty tough games, especially Rifle round, I liked it ;D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on December 25, 2008, 09:29:13 pm
phaild to Q

[GG] 0-2 {Q} awsome. first game was so close.. :) just think we have train more before attacking against Q

Yeah pretty tough games, especially Rifle round, I liked it ;D

I found this pic on the internets and since Imageshack is fkin around i gotta post it like this.. man i just couldnt resist ! =D

http://kerrolisaa.com/image.php?image_id=1038


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on December 25, 2008, 10:28:01 pm
Code: [Select]
[img]http://omglol.kerrolisaa.com/1/1038.jpg[/img]
"copy image location" -> paste -> put inside img brackets -> done :)

(http://omglol.kerrolisaa.com/1/1038.jpg)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jage on December 27, 2008, 02:34:24 pm
We proudly present your newest member... mario!
(http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/6634/lierox1271ft2.png)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on December 27, 2008, 02:50:43 pm
At least he is not a lagger.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Frey on December 27, 2008, 04:07:22 pm
Fancy ping I got there :D
mario pwns


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 27, 2008, 05:07:55 pm
lol from 6 persons,3 were laggers -.-
lol'd @ nack


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 27, 2008, 05:38:29 pm
What's going on here? Karmen, how many cws have you failed while I was gone (I'm still not here ::))? Lame ass gaming ftw!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Frey on December 27, 2008, 06:51:00 pm
What's going on here? Karmen, how many cws have you failed while I was gone (I'm still not here ::))? Lame ass gaming ftw!
You heard the man, LaG ftw. He's damn right there!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Umistand on December 27, 2008, 07:07:04 pm
What's going on here? Karmen, how many cws have you failed while I was gone (I'm still not here ::))? Lame ass gaming ftw!
You heard the man, LaG ftw. He's damn right there!
Word! As much as I hate to do this, I gotta give you a + karma.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: ONeill on December 27, 2008, 08:24:14 pm
I'm so bored of bad reputation and hate what is on me cause i tried GG so i have enough of this so im off GG. :-[


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on December 27, 2008, 10:03:32 pm
I'm so bored of bad reputation and hate what is on me cause i tried GG so i have enough of this so im off GG. :-[

onoez

NOW THE REAL NEWS!!

Mario realized that Q is way better than GG so he decided to do what's right !

(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/2518/kghkghkhgkghnq8.png) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/kghkghkhgkghnq8.png/1/w800.png) (http://g.imageshack.us/img81/kghkghkhgkghnq8.png/1/)



Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sebbe on December 28, 2008, 12:59:00 am
I'm so bored of bad reputation and hate what is on me cause i tried GG so i have enough of this so im off GG. :-[

onoez

NOW THE REAL NEWS!!

Mario realized that Q is way better than GG so he decided to do what's right !

(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/2518/kghkghkhgkghnq8.png) (http://imageshack.us)
(http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/kghkghkhgkghnq8.png/1/w800.png) (http://g.imageshack.us/img81/kghkghkhgkghnq8.png/1/)



That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: MissingNo. on December 28, 2008, 01:43:20 am
Mama....Luigi?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 28, 2008, 01:49:10 am
lol how can u use computer that uses finnish language,lodur? -.-


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Perkele on December 28, 2008, 03:05:45 am
Just a one big frigggin joke

*esit* But LaG PWNAS!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on December 28, 2008, 03:27:35 am
lol how can u use computer that uses finnish language,lodur? -.-

says the guy whos language is almost straight copy from finnish xd


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Perkele on December 28, 2008, 03:35:39 am
Good job GG!  :-*


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on December 28, 2008, 04:54:35 am
LOL, druFF posted on LXA... SM-liiga thread omg?

nice kills lodur btw.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 29, 2008, 07:56:58 pm
Hi, I'm back now. What the hell is going on here!? :o I'm away for 5 days and this thread has turned into sand box

I removed Neill from trial list  :-\


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on December 29, 2008, 08:03:23 pm
Hi, I'm back now.
I had nightmares of this moment for so long.. The handgun spam, I can still see it whenever I close my eyes - which is more than can be said about you. ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 30, 2008, 12:44:05 pm
Too bad Neill decided to leave. Well...what the hell, Sentry now joins as a trial  :P Maybe because GG already has 2 ex-AwE:s

I hate loosing members though


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 30, 2008, 07:18:53 pm
[GG] 2-1 [NG]
[GG] 1-2 {Q} Really good games.  I enjoyed them and pissed my pants  :-[


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on December 30, 2008, 08:37:07 pm
Too bad Neill decided to leave. Well...what the hell, Sentry now joins as a trial  :P Maybe because GG already has 2 ex-AwE:s

I hate loosing members though
please, there is a big difference between loosing (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/loosing) and losing (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/losing). Wanna start use the second one in cases like these?
By the way I have a crush on you Rakkula. I've seen many impassionate dreams about you  :-*


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on December 30, 2008, 08:47:35 pm
Too bad Neill decided to leave. Well...what the hell, Sentry now joins as a trial  :P Maybe because GG already has 2 ex-AwE:s

I hate loosing members though
please, there is a big difference between loosing (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/loosing) and losing (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/losing). Wanna start use the second one in cases like these?
There is a big difference between use and using. Wanna try using the second one, in cases like these?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 30, 2008, 08:53:55 pm
I hate loosing members though
please, there is a big difference between loosing (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/loosing) and losing (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/losing). Wanna start use the second one in cases like these?
Meh, I made that mistake on purpose just to check if anyone would notice it  ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on December 30, 2008, 08:55:40 pm
There is a big difference between use and using. Wanna try using the second one, in cases like these?

I don't think that comma is really necessary.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 30, 2008, 09:03:02 pm
What the hell is this!? GG thread isn't here for spam like the FoH thread. Stop being pettifoggers here, okay? I'll start modifying your post soon. I'll show you my all-mighty powers in this thread by messing with Hatten's message


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on December 30, 2008, 09:08:09 pm
oh sorry, thanks for correcting me. I will try to start using "using" when it is appropriate. :)

If anybody else finds grammatical errors and misspellings in my posts feel free to pm me. I like getting corrected.

edit:
By the way I have a crush on you Rakkula. I've seen many impassionate dreams about you  :-*
lmao! xD
Don't start abusing your mod powers now >:( j/k


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on December 30, 2008, 09:17:44 pm
What the hell is this!? GG thread isn't here for spam like the FoH thread. Stop being pettifoggers here, okay? I'll start modifying your post soon. I'll show you my all-mighty powers in this thread by messing with Hatten's message
What's pettifoggers mean? And besides, if you don't like spam just delete it. We can modify our posts after you do btw.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 30, 2008, 09:22:08 pm
What's pettifoggers mean? And besides, if you don't like spam just delete it. We can modify our posts after you do btw.
I reckon it means a person who raises petty remarks (correcting spelling etc. (Just don't point out me)) and argues by quibbling.
      I don't hate spam as long as it's tolerable. Besides, it gives me a reason to respond and ergo increase my post count. This will make my virtual phallus grow faster in comparison to my real dick using a penis pump. Ignore the last sentence plz


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on December 30, 2008, 09:23:56 pm
What's pettifoggers mean? And besides, if you don't like spam just delete it. We can modify our posts after you do btw.
I reckon it means a person who raises petty remarks (correcting spelling etc. (Just don't point out me)) and argues by quibbling.
K thanks. Btw nice catch with Sentry. He's nice, just needed a real clan.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 30, 2008, 09:38:35 pm
Btw nice catch with Sentry. He's nice, just needed a real clan.
Yeah, magma told me about him and then I put him in trial.

How do you like my avatar? I just bought it.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on December 30, 2008, 09:43:19 pm
Btw nice catch with Sentry. He's nice, just needed a real clan.
Yeah, magma told me about him and then I put him in trial.

How do you like my avatar? I just bought it.
Rofl creepy, but funny.  :P Nice. I'll +karma you in a few hours.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on December 30, 2008, 10:27:04 pm
How do you like my avatar? I just bought it.
huhu ;D it's nice, have you made it by yourself? ;o
and how could you get 1000 creds? you're just "LXA know-it-all"! fokkin forum gamer  :-*
;>


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on December 30, 2008, 11:16:53 pm
How do you like my avatar? I just bought it.
huhu ;D it's nice, have you made it by yourself? ;o
and how could you get 1000 creds? you're just "LXA know-it-all"! fokkin forum gamer  :-*
;>

I made like 2000 credits when the arcade scores were reset!

Oh and I don't like the avatar Rakkula, now go earn another 1000 and change it! :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 31, 2008, 10:36:46 am
huhu ;D it's nice, have you made it by yourself? ;o and how could you get 1000 creds? you're just "LXA know-it-all"! fokkin forum gamer
Nah, copy-paste from google. I got those 1000 credits by spamming in the forum games section and breaking new scores.

@Sak, how come you don't like my avatar?  :'(


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: pelya on December 31, 2008, 11:55:51 am
How do you like my avatar? I just bought it.
huhu ;D it's nice, have you made it by yourself? ;o
and how could you get 1000 creds? you're just "LXA know-it-all"! fokkin forum gamer  :-*
;>

I made like 2000 credits when the arcade scores were reset!

My countdown bot pwns your arcade scores! :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on December 31, 2008, 11:58:46 am
ofc ^^


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 31, 2008, 03:46:07 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q} Good games for us. We didn't play lame then. I was just cautios with my last live though.  :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Cizin on December 31, 2008, 03:54:19 pm
yes you did.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 31, 2008, 05:41:34 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q} Good games for us. We didn't play lame then. I was just cautios with my last live though.  :P
liar got pwnt -.-
for u,only good games can be the ones u win...
stop laming for REAL,stop caring of the result(except kills maybe)
with each win,GG loses more reputation


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 31, 2008, 06:55:52 pm
for u,only good games can be the ones u win...
Very often yes. But I think that some of games we lost were really good. So the word only is wrong.
stop laming for REAL,stop caring of the result(except kills maybe)
with each win,GG loses more reputation
We honestly didn't play lame. And we don't lose reputation: the contrary actually. Reputation can be both positive and negative. So it actually gives us more reputation.
      I also care for the results because I'm a pretty competitive player (not saying I was very good at it). Competitiveness Isn't a bad thing imo.

If I play lame it means I can't win otherwise.  Moreover, today I'm a far cry from the lamer I used to be before joining LXA. Take it as a compliment. And I rarely play lame imo. Don't know what was so lame in the previous cw.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on December 31, 2008, 08:38:27 pm
We honestly didn't play lame. And we don't lose reputation: the contrary actually. Reputation can be both positive and negative. So it actually gives us more reputation.
      I also care for the results because I'm a pretty competitive player (not saying I was very good at it). Competitiveness Isn't a bad thing imo.

If I play lame it means I can't win otherwise.  Moreover, today I'm a far cry from the lamer I used to be before joining LXA. Take it as a compliment. And I rarely play lame imo. Don't know what was so lame in the previous cw.
u played lame even in Monco's server,each game.. anyway it's sometimes better to admit your mistakes,but since u don't,then there is no need to argue someone as childish as you..
stop acting nice,when it isn't actually nice


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 31, 2008, 09:10:17 pm
u played lame even in Monco's server,each game..
Errr...how come I played lame in Monco's server? When I ran for a moment I was simply running after Monco and not away from you. Frankly, I don't care whether you believe this it not but that's the truth.
anyway it's sometimes better to admit your mistakes,but since u don't,then there is no need to argue someone as childish as you..
stop acting nice,when it isn't actually nice
...And what do you mean by admiting mistakes? I admit I play lame sometimes but I can't see why I was playing lame on Sak's server. Anyways, I've reduced laming a lot (someone might remember me on palkeo's). And what do you mean by childish? Tell exactly what makes me childish in your opinion.
 
Why do you want me to stop being nice? I want to be nice to everyone and I'm not trying insult nor bash you the way you're trying to do. On Sak's you called me and idiot and before that the next school shooter. Imo, especially things like the latter one are something so serious that there's nothing to make a joke about. Frankly, I don't see why you see me or my behavior childish when your insulting others (or just me) like a bloody narcist.
     I've also asked you to change your behavior towards me several times. After waiting for a few weeks and seeing no change at all I don't see anymore reasons why I should even have this conversation with you. That's also why I banned you from my server. I hope we'd get along, but since you seem so reluctant to doing so I don't enjoy playing with you.
       This also leads me to Pelimies and Thor, who I once hated. After a while I found out that they are pretty nice guys after the bad first encounter. I also believe that you're a nice guy and that's why I'm ready to unban you if you change the way you act towards me.
       How does my insult-free text seem so inmature to you? I act nice and I always thought that was a good thing. Do you think I'm anticking about this? The fact that you call me childish is in conflict with your actions, and by this I mean your constant whining and bashing. I just fail to see your point and the fact whether it's my stupidity or yours is more open to doubt.
      I also hope that we can stop giving each other - karma mindlessly. The reason why you started it had nothing to do with spam as you said in the Karma section. Below my "spammy" message Syphon posted a message only including "xD". Did you give him negative karma? I doubt it. This leads me to believe that the real motive about giving me - karma was only the reason that you don't like me. I used the same reason and gave you negative Karma etc. Could we plz stop this? Just PM me if you do. I can say that I'd very much like to stop.

And then in general I'd like to ask why some consider me an asshole. Is it my personality, my playing style or both? I try to avoid insulting others so that can't be the reason.

But I agree to your point about admiting one's mistakes. I just can't see the mistakes you're talking about.

Now that you've decided to make this public instead of sorting it out with primate messages this conversation must happen with my rules. This means that you will not bash, insult or leave anything unexplained. And to those few curious and intrusive people out there: If you're not involved, don't get involved unless if you have something very emphatic to say. I really hope that iliera will answer to this post with decency and by thoroughly explaining his thoughts.

Edit: If anyone uses insulting words or tone in their text which I don't like, I'll punish those individuals by messing with their post, turning them into something ridiculous.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on December 31, 2008, 09:14:05 pm
for u,only good games can be the ones u win...
Very often yes. But I think that some of games we lost were really good. So the word only is wrong.
stop laming for REAL,stop caring of the result(except kills maybe)
with each win,GG loses more reputation
We honestly didn't play lame. And we don't lose reputation: the contrary actually. Reputation can be both positive and negative. So it actually gives us more reputation.
      I also care for the results because I'm a pretty competitive player (not saying I was very good at it). Competitiveness Isn't a bad thing imo.

If I play lame it means I can't win otherwise.  Moreover, today I'm a far cry from the lamer I used to be before joining LXA. Take it as a compliment. And I rarely play lame imo. Don't know what was so lame in the previous cw.

u didnt play lame? fu. yea. Magma had 2 lives, you 0 and i had 0 and STILL i was the one attacking XD think about it rookie. WHO PLAYD LAME?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on December 31, 2008, 09:18:55 pm
u didnt play lame? fu. yea. Magma had 2 lives, you 0 and i had 0 and STILL i was the one attacking XD think about it rookie. WHO PLAYD LAME?
Err...if this was the case, was it me or magma playing lame? I had 1 live and 17 hp. Doesn't really encourage me to rush. Magma on the other hand had 2 lives left. I doubt if I was the one playing lame.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jeff on December 31, 2008, 09:29:50 pm
I look forward to clanwarring you guys  ;)
EditRakkula: Brilliant. We'll see you in cw then. I edited this post because I wanter to keep my long post up


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on December 31, 2008, 11:18:58 pm


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on January 01, 2009, 02:17:03 am
Lodur stop being an idiot and posting here about him being lame. All of you guys stop doing it.. He makes it obvious and pretty much admits it. You know they're going to play lame, why keep playing them? Rakkula has the power to delete any shitty posts here he wants, he doesn't. I think he likes to argue and you posting here doesn't phase him. You're only going to get yourself more frustrated because he's only going to come up with better and more clever excuses and you are going to need to get back at him, because you just can't let something go. They say the humble and the appreciative are the most happy people in the world. Why? They don't spend their time looking at what they COULD have gotten, rather at what they already have. {Q} has many wins and yet there just HAS TO BE AN EXCUSE FOR LOSING, to [GG]. Just get over it. Brush it off..

[GG] 2-1 {Q} Good games for us. We didn't play lame then. I was just cautios with my last live though.  :P
liar got pwnt -.-
for u,only good games can be the ones u win...
stop laming for REAL,stop caring of the result(except kills maybe)
with each win,GG loses more reputation
Win.... And there lies the problem.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on January 01, 2009, 02:33:07 am
Lodur stop being an idiot and posting here about him being lame. All of you guys stop doing it.. He makes it obvious and pretty much admits it. You know they're going to play lame, why keep playing them? Rakkula has the power to delete any shitty posts here he wants, he doesn't. I think he likes to argue and you posting here doesn't phase him. You're only going to get yourself more frustrated because he's only going to come up with better and more clever excuses and you are going to need to get back at him, because you just can't let something go. They say the humble and the appreciative are the most happy people in the world. Why? They don't spend their time looking at what they COULD have gotten, rather at what they already have. {Q} has many wins and yet there just HAS TO BE AN EXCUSE FOR LOSING, to [GG]. Just get over it. Brush it off..

[GG] 2-1 {Q} Good games for us. We didn't play lame then. I was just cautios with my last live though.  :P
liar got pwnt -.-
for u,only good games can be the ones u win...
stop laming for REAL,stop caring of the result(except kills maybe)
with each win,GG loses more reputation
Win.... And there lies the problem.

Just get back to cw:ing with one of your 10 clans pls.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on January 01, 2009, 02:36:35 am
Lodur stop being an idiot and posting here about him being lame. All of you guys stop doing it.. He makes it obvious and pretty much admits it. You know they're going to play lame, why keep playing them? Rakkula has the power to delete any shitty posts here he wants, he doesn't. I think he likes to argue and you posting here doesn't phase him. You're only going to get yourself more frustrated because he's only going to come up with better and more clever excuses and you are going to need to get back at him, because you just can't let something go. They say the humble and the appreciative are the most happy people in the world. Why? They don't spend their time looking at what they COULD have gotten, rather at what they already have. {Q} has many wins and yet there just HAS TO BE AN EXCUSE FOR LOSING, to [GG]. Just get over it. Brush it off..

[GG] 2-1 {Q} Good games for us. We didn't play lame then. I was just cautios with my last live though.  :P
liar got pwnt -.-
for u,only good games can be the ones u win...
stop laming for REAL,stop caring of the result(except kills maybe)
with each win,GG loses more reputation
Win.... And there lies the problem.

Just get back to cw:ing with one of your 10 clans pls.
Nice. All you have to say.  :D :D I'm in one clan btw. Anything else you have to say? PM me.  ::)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 01, 2009, 01:46:48 pm


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: miri on January 01, 2009, 02:50:14 pm
I'm a dirty little hoe! I also have AIDS like the most Estonians and I only have about 2 more months to live so **** you all! And GG kicks ass! We're nothing compared to uber hot Rakkula and magma is great aswell


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on January 01, 2009, 03:08:26 pm
(http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/8701/whineeo5.jpg)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 01, 2009, 03:46:59 pm
Okay then, iliera. I warned you about continuing on the same insulting line. Seems like sense makes no sense to you at all. Pretty childish in my opinion. You've been saying everyone how childish I am, but at least I've got some balls to explain my thoughts. You've never even said to me what makes me childish and the fact that you don't only tells me that you're the childish one here. It's very inmature that you show no skills whatsoever to explain why you feel the way you do. I've got to say this now: You're a ****ing idiot.

Go grow some some balls kiddo.

And btw, now I'll be the smart one. I'll stop giving you negative karma mindlessly. What ever happens, I won't retaliate. Should you continue doing so, it only shows people what a pathetic little kid you are.

I didn't want any of this and now, it's all in your hands kid.

Happy new year to you too iliera!  :D

Here's my long post again if you'd finally bother to answer it. However, I doubt it.
u played lame even in Monco's server,each game..
Errr...how come I played lame in Monco's server? When I ran for a moment I was simply running after Monco and not away from you. Frankly, I don't care whether you believe this it not but that's the truth.
anyway it's sometimes better to admit your mistakes,but since u don't,then there is no need to argue someone as childish as you..
stop acting nice,when it isn't actually nice
...And what do you mean by admiting mistakes? I admit I play lame sometimes but I can't see why I was playing lame on Sak's server. Anyways, I've reduced laming a lot (someone might remember me on palkeo's). And what do you mean by childish? Tell exactly what makes me childish in your opinion.
 
Why do you want me to stop being nice? I want to be nice to everyone and I'm not trying insult nor bash you the way you're trying to do. On Sak's you called me and idiot and before that the next school shooter. Imo, especially things like the latter one are something so serious that there's nothing to make a joke about. Frankly, I don't see why you see me or my behavior childish when your insulting others (or just me) like a bloody narcist.
     I've also asked you to change your behavior towards me several times. After waiting for a few weeks and seeing no change at all I don't see anymore reasons why I should even have this conversation with you. That's also why I banned you from my server. I hope we'd get along, but since you seem so reluctant to doing so I don't enjoy playing with you.
       This also leads me to Pelimies and Thor, who I once hated. After a while I found out that they are pretty nice guys after the bad first encounter. I also believe that you're a nice guy and that's why I'm ready to unban you if you change the way you act towards me.
       How does my insult-free text seem so inmature to you? I act nice and I always thought that was a good thing. Do you think I'm anticking about this? The fact that you call me childish is in conflict with your actions, and by this I mean your constant whining and bashing. I just fail to see your point and the fact whether it's my stupidity or yours is more open to doubt.
      I also hope that we can stop giving each other - karma mindlessly. The reason why you started it had nothing to do with spam as you said in the Karma section. Below my "spammy" message Syphon posted a message only including "xD". Did you give him negative karma? I doubt it. This leads me to believe that the real motive about giving me - karma was only the reason that you don't like me. I used the same reason and gave you negative Karma etc. Could we plz stop this? Just PM me if you do. I can say that I'd very much like to stop.

And then in general I'd like to ask why some consider me an asshole. Is it my personality, my playing style or both? I try to avoid insulting others so that can't be the reason.

But I agree to your point about admiting one's mistakes. I just can't see the mistakes you're talking about.

Now that you've decided to make this public instead of sorting it out with primate messages this conversation must happen with my rules. This means that you will not bash, insult or leave anything unexplained. And to those few curious and intrusive people out there: If you're not involved, don't get involved unless if you have something very emphatic to say. I really hope that iliera will answer to this post with decency and by thoroughly explaining his thoughts.

Edit: If anyone uses insulting words or tone in their text which I don't like, I'll punish those individuals by messing with their post, turning them into something ridiculous.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on January 01, 2009, 04:11:00 pm
Well I can't say I would like to defend Iliera on this matter, but IMHO this is what you, Rakkula, should have done a long time ago:
I'll stop giving you negative karma mindlessly.

Good that you realized to do it now, but even then it wasn't really necessary to make another big post about it here. In my eyes that post doesn't make you look any more clever or mature than Iliera, and I can only imagine what the rest of the people who read it will think. You gotta realize that a huge portion of this community consists of people who are not willing or capable of backing up their opinions with any logical arguments, so you're really all alone in this 'fight' with all those big posts of yours.

Oh and I just read some posts which you have edited here, and I must say I sincerely thought at least some of your maturity was genuine. Unfortunately your edits in other people's posts have proven me wrong.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 01, 2009, 04:15:47 pm
In my eyes that post doesn't make you look any more clever or mature than Iliera, and I can only imagine what the rest of the people who read it will think.
That's right. However, if one doesn't back up or base his comments on anything rational, the content of that message is pointless. All I wanted to do was the settle the differences between iliera and I. Too bad he seems so disinclined to do so.  I wasn't trying to look smarter nor more mature, but simply to get to the bottom of this issue.

And you're not backing up iliera, because his the one who started it. Who should stop first: the one who was mistreated or the one mistreating? So I was the one who should realize what to do? That's pretty naive. It's both his fault and mine. At least I was the one trying to get along and that's something you should've definitely brought up

I'm not the one misbehaving imo. Can you say else?
You gotta realize that a huge portion of this community consists of people who are not willing or capable of backing up their opinions with any logical arguments, so you're really all alone in this 'fight' with all those big posts of yours.
Yep, that's why I hang around those who are capable of doing so. However, I'd like get along with the rest if they'd show at least some respect or dignity without pathetically trying to bash another person.

Edit: Sak, I deleted your post. Didn't really like it's tone. I wouldn't call this thing with iliera insignificant and I definitely wasn't boosting my ego like you said. I'll stop this now and I hope this won't be brought up again in this thread at least. Any futher post will be deleted. This didn't work, my bad. Period. Goodbye.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on January 01, 2009, 05:00:48 pm
Hmm, I believe I posted another post here. Well I see you've run out of arguments so you decided to delete it. I don't remember what I said in that post anymore, but I'm pretty sure it was nothing offensive.

Well, have it your way, I'm not gonna repeat anything so you can consider yourself a 'winner' here. I hope you feel smart and mature now 8)

EDIT: all right I just read the edit in your post. I'll just say that deleting every post with a tone you don't like isn't really mature. Maybe you wouldn't call the fight insignificant but I do, and it's just a matter of definitions really. Still you can't just delete my post if you disagree with me (or you can but shouldn't). Also I see you like to have the last word which is fine by me, you can delete this if you want or post any smart arguments after this one also. I know I have done nothing wrong here and I don't need to prove it to anyone.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on January 01, 2009, 05:07:26 pm
Hmm, I believe I posted another post here. Well I see you've run out of arguments so you decided to delete it. I don't remember what I said in that post anymore, but I'm pretty sure it was nothing offensive.

Well, have it your way, I'm not gonna repeat anything so you can consider yourself a 'winner' here. I hope you feel smart and mature now 8)

Exactly what i tried to say earlier xd When Rakkula/[GG] dont know what to do they have to pull some lame tricks and in this case delete your post which most likely pwned Rakkula hard and crunched his testicles!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 01, 2009, 05:13:46 pm
Hmm, I believe I posted another post here. Well I see you've run out of arguments so you decided to delete it. I don't remember what I said in that post anymore, but I'm pretty sure it was nothing offensive.

Well, have it your way, I'm not gonna repeat anything so you can consider yourself a 'winner' here. I hope you feel smart and mature now 8)
What the...? The only reason why I did it was that iliera and I could get along. That's the motive for above posts. I don't consider myself a winner because I hoped we'd make some progress. We didn't and that's just too bad.
        I deleted your post because you were making assumptions that I did this to boost my ego with long, argumentative post. Moreover, you totally neglected iliera's part in this issue consentrating only on my actions. It's about both of us and that's it. Your message was a bit....ehmm...biased or inadequote.

You also said that you don't care who started it nor who was mistreated. Neither do I, but if that is the case both sides should be under critisism. Futhermore, you said you don't care. If you don't care you shouldn't've got involved in the first place. At least I gave it a try.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on January 01, 2009, 05:34:30 pm
Hmm, I believe I posted another post here. Well I see you've run out of arguments so you decided to delete it. I don't remember what I said in that post anymore, but I'm pretty sure it was nothing offensive.

Well, have it your way, I'm not gonna repeat anything so you can consider yourself a 'winner' here. I hope you feel smart and mature now 8)
What the...? The only reason why I did it was that iliera and I could get along. That's the motive for above posts. I don't consider myself a winner because I hoped we'd make some progress. We didn't and that's just too bad.
        I deleted your post because you were making assumptions that I did this to boost my ego with long, argumentative post. Moreover, you totally neglected iliera's part in this issue consentrating only on my actions. It's about both of us and that's it. Your message was a bit....ehmm...biased or inadequote.

You also said that you don't care who started it nor who was mistreated. Neither do I, but if that is the case both sides should be under critisism. Futhermore, you said you don't care. If you don't care you shouldn't've got involved in the first place. At least I gave it a try.
In my eyes, you won. And if you were always that reasonable and understanding, you'd get the respect you deserve.  :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on January 01, 2009, 06:07:57 pm
Well even Q doesnt play fair, that one player finds aberrations in enemy clans gaming doesnt mean theyr own clan is any better.. nobody cant say that GG's playing is lame. check out ur own clan players styles before whining. :-X


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on January 01, 2009, 06:11:54 pm
Well even Q doesnt play fair, that one player finds aberrations in enemy clans gaming doesnt mean theyr own clan is any better.. nobody cant say that GG's playing is lame. check out ur own clan players styles before whining. :-X
I was just waiting to say that..  :P Fine that you said it yourself thou. Don't see how people can talk allll kinds of shit aaaaaalllllllll day when, ehm. Well... most of the comments are pretty hypocritical in most situations nowadays.  :D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 01, 2009, 07:03:31 pm
In my eyes, you won. And if you were always that reasonable and understanding, you'd get the respect you deserve.  :)
Well thank you, but for me that wasn't about winning  :)
Well even Q doesnt play fair, that one player finds aberrations in enemy clans gaming doesnt mean theyr own clan is any better.. nobody cant say that GG's playing is lame. check out ur own clan players styles before whining. :-X
I concur


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 01, 2009, 08:05:26 pm
[GG] 2-0 [Emp] Good, easy games  :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Mr. FTW on January 01, 2009, 08:22:06 pm
sick clan name :3


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Joonazz on January 02, 2009, 08:15:13 am
I find it a bit strange how much people are criticizing this clan here. One can say many things about playing styles but sounds more like excuses. You just need someone to bash to make yourself look better! But you fail hard. And how about Iliera, whatever he writes is pathetically embarassing for himself, no offense! Perhaps leave GG alone and check the mirror.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Gigolo on January 02, 2009, 08:50:16 am
Just seems like a bunch of people picking on Rakkula because it's fun. He has no good comebacks so he deletes posts and modifies them, which whatever he's got the power to do so in his thread, so if that's how he gets his jollies let him. ^_^

I've got nothing against GG, just think it's funny that Rakkula modifies peoples posts to say such funny (dumb) things.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jeff on January 02, 2009, 08:55:48 am
I'm a dirty little hoe! I also have AIDS like the most Estonians and I only have about 2 more months to live so **** you all! And GG kicks ass! We're nothing compared to uber hot Rakkula and magma is great aswell

rofl


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on January 02, 2009, 09:56:51 am
I've read now two pages of nice posts in this thread, and given me a good laugh, so for a long time I must say...

one word... SaiPa!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 02, 2009, 09:58:49 am
This is why I modified their posts.
If anyone uses insulting words or tone in their text which I don't like, I'll punish those individuals by messing with their post, turning them into something ridiculous.
Haven't done this to anyone else but those who broke against this simplle rule. And Hatten doesn't count then...  8)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 02, 2009, 10:28:46 am
cool actually,your topic gets posts faster than "pwn the picture". i should make separated topic for "whining"

happy new year fellow addicts and other kids


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jeff on January 02, 2009, 10:30:11 am
That would be genious


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on January 02, 2009, 10:47:14 am
This is why I modified their posts.
If anyone uses insulting words or tone in their text which I don't like, I'll punish those individuals by messing with their post, turning them into something ridiculous.
Haven't done this to anyone else but those who broke against this simplle rule. And Hatten doesn't count then...  8)

I must comment on this one: of course you can come up with any pathetic rules you wish in your clanthread and modify other people's posts based on them, but I don't think it's very nice. The one post of mine you deleted wasn't even in any way particularly insulting. You might have felt I made some false accusations there, but that was honestly how all this seemed to me. Still, instead of avoiding the accusations by deleting the post, I feel you should have faced them like a man and proven me wrong. The same goes for modifying the posts: if you feel offeneded by them, I think you should show what the people posting them are doing wrong and not take that equally offensive attitude towards them.

Just my opinion of course, and you are free to do whatever you please in this thread. I can't wait to see what hilarious edits you have prepared for this post.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 02, 2009, 12:08:46 pm
I must comment on this one: of course you can come up with any pathetic rules you wish in your clanthread and modify other people's posts based on them, but I don't think it's very nice.
Nope, that's just beucause their post weren't nice either. As long as they are not insulting I won't modify them.
The one post of mine you deleted wasn't even in any way particularly insulting. You might have felt I made some false accusations there, but that was honestly how all this seemed to me. Still, instead of avoiding the accusations by deleting the post, I feel you should have faced them like a man and proven me wrong
Yes, alright. I made a mistake by deleting your post. However, I already answered to most of the points you brought up in your message in my previous posts.
The same goes for modifying the posts: if you feel offeneded by them, I think you should show what the people posting them are doing wrong and not take that equally offensive attitude towards them.
You said yourself that most people here are reluctant to listen such "crap". "Unable or unwilling" if I recall it right. I already tried doing so with no succes whatsoever, so now I just did the same. I didin't start this to hear insults made by others (you're not one of them) and that's why I warned them about what was going to happen. In the end there's not much difference whether I delete those post or modify them because both of them had nothing more in them but bullshit.
Just my opinion of course, and you are free to do whatever you please in this thread. I can't wait to see what hilarious edits you have prepared for this post.
Bah, I'm not going to edit this. This was made in the way it should be made imo.

When I deleted your first post I was already pretty pissed and wanted to leave all this crap behind. I even gave a thought to the idea of deleting all post made in this thread concerning this issue. Well....then I'd get complaints with the contents of which you all know.
       Mainly I got really pissed when you concentrated only onto my actions instead of to both iliera's and mine. You said you didn't like to defend iliera in this matter. You didin't even defend him, instead you neglected all his actions which I find very biased or inadequote.

Edit: [GG] 2-0 [M80]
        [GG] 2-0 [M80]
        [GG] 0-2 ~A~   A gave quite a challenge. Good games altogether, I hated A's bans in FF though  ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 02, 2009, 12:46:14 pm
Quote
M80 was easy
nice,should i post things like that too in any war i win?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 02, 2009, 12:51:27 pm
Quote
M80 was easy
nice,should i post things like that too in any war i win?
Nope. Check my messages and look how many times I've said this after winning another clan. So "in any war i win" was very wrong.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 02, 2009, 12:58:26 pm
but then what was the point to post that? aaa okok i get it:
i'm proud of you that you GG is better than m80


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 02, 2009, 01:26:49 pm
but then what was the point to post that? aaa okok i get it:
i'm proud of you that you GG is better than m80
Err....that's not the point. I said so because it was easy. In the last round we played 3 vs 2 and still won. I'm not saying we're better. Just saying it was easy. Btw, when we were playing in Sak's server, you also said easy. So don't be such a hypocrite

Edit: As a clan we fared better in that cw than M80. Why did you even bother to bring that up?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on January 02, 2009, 01:37:05 pm
but then what was the point to post that? aaa okok i get it:
i'm proud of you that you GG is better than m80
Err....that's not the point. I said so because it was easy. In the last round we played 3 vs 2 and still won. I'm not saying we're better. Just saying it was easy. Btw, when we were playing in Sak's server, you also said easy. So don't be such a hypocrite

Edit: As a clan we fared better in that cw than M80. Why did you even bother to bring that up?

I think it is way different to say "easy" on a server with casual games than after a clanwar on a public forum. I wouldn't feel nice if someone said a clanwar against Sak was easy, even if it was most likely true. Also I have noticed that you, Rakkula, often say "bg" when playing, especially when you are losing or already out, and of course you always remember to say "gg" when you win. I think it shows rather bad attitude, even though the two 'phrases' are so worn-out they lack any real meaning.

I only brought this up because you dragged my innocent server into this useless fight, please try to be more careful about that in the future.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 02, 2009, 01:43:44 pm
funny - u played "3v2" and still won?
and yes.. probably u enjoy people being hypocritical @ u,rakkula,since u would like if i would say "too easy" after winning u in cw?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 02, 2009, 02:15:47 pm
I think it is way different to say "easy" on a server with casual games than after a clanwar on a public forum. I wouldn't feel nice if someone said a clanwar against Sak was easy, even if it was most likely true.
Well....I wouldn't like it either if someone said in a casual game that I was easy to beat. Same thing goes for a cw. But you must notice that I'm not the only one doing so. So I guess you're right, but I don't see much difference
Also I have noticed that you, Rakkula, often say "bg" when playing, especially when you are losing or already out, and of course you always remember to say "gg" when you win. I think it shows rather bad attitude, even though the two 'phrases' are so worn-out they lack any real meaning.
True enough, al though imo it doesn't show bad attitude but simply pointless words.
I only brought this up because you dragged my innocent server into this useless fight, please try to be more careful about that in the future.
I didn't drag your server into this. Your server has nothing to do with this execpt that that's where it happened. So your server was irrelevant to all this. If that was the only reason for bringing this up then lol.

funny - u played "3v2" and still won?
Err...yes. If you insist, I can post screenshots about it as soon as I learn to do it  :-[
and yes.. probably u enjoy people being hypocritical @ u,rakkula,since u would like if i would say "too easy" after winning u in cw?
Now did I ever say that? Btw it's simply easy. I read through that many times and I still don't really understand it.

What Sakmongkol says makes sense (mostly at least). Even iliera is right sometimes. This time I simply can't understand his text. Sorry then. And how did 2 words end up in this  :-X






Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Benn0 on January 02, 2009, 02:24:42 pm
"gg-aka. good game"-is a phrase that was originally used when a player enjoyed the game. Contrary to this cases "I win==I'm leet. You could of course only enjoy games that you win, but how fun is that?! Especially a game like OLX, which doesn't have a competitive scene.

"bg-aka. bad game"- is a phrase that is used when you loose and try to explain how leet you actually are, If you would play on your normally high level. It's also a phrase that renders any kind of "I'm not lame!" defence useless.

Rakkula, you keep posting "Clanwars" with a nice touch that should? boost your leetness on the expense of people around you. Yet you've stated that OLX/LieroX is a joke as a competitive game.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on January 02, 2009, 02:29:22 pm
Quote
And how did 2 words end up in this  Lips sealed
Because it is not nice to say those words.

Even if it is easy, you don't have to say it as people might feel bad for it. Just because other users are stupid and lame and evil you don't have to do the same.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: IRC on January 02, 2009, 02:31:05 pm
Rakkula wasn't M80 your previous clan? Shouldn't you then show them at least some respect?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 02, 2009, 02:32:49 pm
Rakkula wasn't M80 your previous clan? Shouldn't you then show them at least some respect?
No. It was SK.

I removed those 2 words now (as if it'd make any difference now that we've filled another page with this  ;D)

Sorry to anyone those words insulted. Now let's cut the crap!


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 02, 2009, 05:09:44 pm
[GG] 1-2 ~A~ Really good games

[GG] 1-2 ~A~Good games also. One of the most exiting cws I've played. Extremely tight


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Flare on January 03, 2009, 08:03:55 pm
[GG] 1-2 ~A~ Really good games

[GG] 1-2 ~A~Good games also. One of the most exiting cws I've played. Extremely tight

Fixed your typo.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: ONeill on January 03, 2009, 08:10:22 pm
[GG] 1-2 ~A~ Really good games

[GG] 2-1 ~A~Good games also. One of the most exiting cws I've played. Extremely tight

I thought A won that?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Steelcrush on January 03, 2009, 08:39:00 pm
[GG] 1-2 ~A~ Really good games

[GG] 2-1 ~A~Good games also. One of the most exiting cws I've played. Extremely tight

I thought A won that?
Ye.

[GG] 1-2 ~A~ Really good games

[GG] 1-2 ~A~Good games also. One of the most exiting cws I've played. Extremely tight

Fixed your typo.
Look.

Rakkula wasn't M80 your previous clan? Shouldn't you then show them at least some respect?
No. It was SK.

I removed those 2 words now (as if it'd make any difference now that we've filled another page with this  ;D)

Sorry to anyone those words insulted. Now let's cut the crap!
Finally nice to hear those words.  :)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 04, 2009, 10:29:11 am
Fixed your typo.
Sorry, I always make that mistake. At least it was typed right on the first page


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 04, 2009, 12:46:56 pm
PvTNooB aka Lucifer joins GG as a trial member.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 04, 2009, 01:27:57 pm
and left 5 minutes ago


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on January 04, 2009, 04:03:17 pm
Nice avatar iliera.

Is he [Sn] lucifer" btw? or |hero| lucifer (=[WvW] Caesar, wouldn't it be a nice new that pwner like caesar multiclanned?)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 04, 2009, 04:14:44 pm
and left 5 minutes ago
I heard some rumours about you talking crap about GG, causing him to leave. I also heard that others got into the same bullshit talk.

Don't do this again. You're harming the clan with talk which isn't true. Would you like if I'd talk crap to your new clan members thus doing harm to your clan? This bullshit has already caused us to lose 2 members. People don't care to find out whether this talk is true or not. They believe what you say because they want to believe that. Same goes for any nasty rumour. Drop it, now!
          I'm not sure absolutely sure about this, but according to what I've heard at least iliera and Perkele were involved. Shame on them


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on January 04, 2009, 04:17:45 pm
What did they say?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on January 04, 2009, 04:21:45 pm
Indeed iliera! Sakmongkol and Rakkula = best friends, [Sak] and [GG] friend clans! And you're in [Sak], you make yourself fool in [Sak] ;_;


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 04, 2009, 04:35:23 pm
What did they say?
That we're runners, campers, lamers, server sucks, etc. And Kuchiki wasn't involved. I already removed her name.
Indeed iliera! Sakmongkol and Rakkula = best friends, [Sak] and [GG] friend clans! And you're in [Sak], you make yourself fool in [Sak] ;_;
Well, not really. We've had some disagreements so now we're keeping some distance. Hopefully just temporarely. However, I agree with your last phrase

Okay, I had a chat with Lucifer and he agreed to wait and check for himself whether the crap some of you have been talking about is true. He's not in GG but will think about joining. I'd appreciate if none of you ****ed this up with crap talk.

Edit: PvT rejoins GG as a trial member after a discussion with Griffin


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on January 04, 2009, 06:16:35 pm
*Sigh*
I don't see why you all hate GG so much, sure they were ultra-lame a week or two ago - but they've got a lot nicer.
I can actually duel Rakk without wanting to self-harm. Admittedly it's not a cw - but at least that means that the casual games are nice.
Stop being so mean.. How many of you have actually even played with them in the past 3 days? People change (sometimes).


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Cizin on January 04, 2009, 06:41:42 pm
Big deal about the casual deathmatches, attend in a clan war against them once in your life. and you might change your "overall view"
Oh yeah, i forgot you don't cw because of exactly those reasons.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on January 04, 2009, 06:44:15 pm
I lack the attention span to do that Ciz. I did once and I didn't see anything particularly crappy. Was doing other stuff too though.
Casual is more fun than cws anyway, everyone almost without exception plays more crappily in them. Including you.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Perkele on January 04, 2009, 07:00:53 pm
naab delete some1 elses posts


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on January 04, 2009, 09:58:55 pm
naab delete some1 elses posts
Who!?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on January 04, 2009, 11:06:38 pm
Let me say this: even though Iliera is in Sak, his views and comments on this topic (or anywhere else) don't represent the overall opinion of Sak or myself. To Iliera I'll say that you can keep these stupid arguments and craptalk and such up if you wish, at this point I don't really care much about them but if you overdo it, there will be consequences.

Of course this PvT guy should know not to listen to everything people say (especially if it's people like Iliera and Perkele), but it's nice to see him back in GG as a trial (if that is the case now).

Also I think everybody should really think about their attitude towards GG and whether they want to express that attitude on a public forum or not. Having done only one cw with them I can't say I know them perfectly, but if you don't like their style there's no real need to cw them anymore then. And surely you don't want to claim that the style of clans like Q would be all perfect either, that would be ridiculous. Take a look in the mirror everyone.

Lastly I must say that Thor really makes himself look like a complete idiot with the posts he comes up with about me, Rakkula, Sak, and GG, without knowing really much anything about what has been going on between us. Thor, shut up if you have nothing useful to say.

Also, yet again, everyone should listen to Griff.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 05, 2009, 06:26:29 am
break the clan and make new again(better tag also maybe).. kick runners... don't start laming again,act nice...
i would love u(and i think i wont be the only one)

and btw, my comments are not from whole Sak, it's just from hypocritical me
p.s i love you,frey


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Flaw on January 05, 2009, 06:35:49 am
Big deal about the casual deathmatches, attend in a clan war against them once in your life. and you might change your "overall view"
Oh yeah, i forgot you don't cw because of exactly those reasons.
Oh lawd what a great advice.
I wonder what I'd think about almost all the clans I've cwed against. Oh that's right. They'd most likely suck.
And good job all on keeping this fight up, I only got on board at page 4 or so but it's been great.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 05, 2009, 10:45:08 am
naab delete some1 elses posts
That's called censorship. All tyrants love it.

I agree with Sakmongkol (mainly) and Griffin (and Joonazz in previous pages + some others). Look in the mirror everyone.

Edit: Yet another page full of this. Hilarious


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Kristoffer on January 05, 2009, 11:03:49 am
I locked in the mirror and my hair is FETT I need to take a shower..

I use schwarzkopf... very nice...


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 05, 2009, 02:43:17 pm
Rakkula: "look in the mirror" - (i never look,cus i'm leet)
anyway idc what u do what u say, i have no reasons to dislike some noobs;) i just play this stupid game,k?(translator: peace motha****a)
just try not to run or play "cautios" when there's no reason(unless ur really scared of me),k? :-* :-*


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 05, 2009, 03:04:46 pm
Rakkula: "look in the mirror" - (i never look,cus i'm leet)
Good for you
anyway idc what u do what u say, i have no reasons to dislike some noobs;)
Didn't get it.
i just play this stupid game,k?(translator: peace motha****a)
Okay. Good
just try not to run or play "cautios" when there's no reason(unless ur really scared of me),k? :-* :-*
I'm not doing so...


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on January 05, 2009, 03:22:26 pm
just try not to run or play "cautios" when there's no reason(unless ur really scared of me),k? :-* :-*
I'm not doing so...

My sig is really arguing against you. Dont forget its your own words =D


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 05, 2009, 04:22:31 pm
My sig is really arguing against you. Dont forget its your own words =D
No, it doesn't. I had a reason to do so. 17hp doesn't really encourage me to rush. Those 17hp could make all the difference between winning and losing


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Umistand on January 05, 2009, 04:30:39 pm
So the win is important for you so you do everything to gain the win and that goes to camping running spamming etc. And if the win wouldnt be important you would just be cool and loose but if you are good enough you could win without lame stuff

And about deleting my post... Was it that necessary, I just said the thruth. It WAS that spamming running etc BUT I dont know how things are nowadays. And becouse the picture you have given to people about your playin style, they keep whining here to you. And now few people keeps saying here that you have changed and that might be true but why would they want to believe that kind of thing becouse you have already given that kind of picture of you.

But gongratz if you have changed but personally I cant believe that (nothing personal)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 05, 2009, 04:36:12 pm
But gongratz if you have changed but personally I cant believe that (nothing personal)
yup it can be so,but atleast i will never know,since i can't play in his server (:


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on January 05, 2009, 04:43:10 pm
Sak, that seriously hurt my feelings.  :'(

I'm just curious, GG is very intresting clan imo. Rakkula was totally unknown atleast for me before november, and now he's leader of good competive clan. And he's the character of [GG], talks for the whole clan. I personally don't care about others gamestyles, very rarely ingame if I'm on that mood.

People should understand that when it's about competive gaming, style is free, the win is the most important thing. Is there something bad in it? I know that this community contains a lot of players who don't play competive gaming. There is nothing bad either. But they should stop complaining about competive players' style. It seriously is pathetic. But more pathetic is that some competive camper complains of another competive players' style. I've seen that kind of issue in this thread too. And of course in many other threads.

If it's too hard to play competive, the choice is to join RIP or some other inactive clan.

But hattensever, as a competive clan [GG] is seriously growing to the top. Keep it up



Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Umistand on January 05, 2009, 05:01:34 pm
I agree some of your points Thor but why wont competitive playing mean agressive playing? Is competetive playing always this ''do anything for win'' style?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 05, 2009, 06:14:08 pm
yup it can be so,but atleast i will never know,since i can't play in his server (:
You can now. I unbanned you. Hopefully, permanently.
I agree some of your points Thor but why wont competitive playing mean agressive playing? Is competetive playing always this ''do anything for win'' style?
I can admin I'm pretty competitive (note that it doesn't mean I won't play for fun). I still won't do anything for win. I used to be an ultra-lame player a couple of months ago but ever since my playing has become more and more fair. Some, like Karmen, play very aggressively. I prefer a somewhat more calm approach, just like magma.

And finally some results:
[GG] 2-0 [Sak]
[GG] 2-0 [Sak] Really good games. I enjoyed playing them. However, there was some whining (or "complaining" said by some) after the first cw.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Jage on January 05, 2009, 06:19:48 pm
I agree some of your points Thor but why wont competitive playing mean agressive playing? Is competetive playing always this ''do anything for win'' style?
People should understand that when it's about competive gaming, style is free, the win is the most important thing.


IMHO whiners should let GG (and everyone else who wants to) play like they want to play.

Btw:
hattensever
lold


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on January 06, 2009, 11:37:56 am
PvTNooB aka Lucifer
[Sn]Lucifer? :o


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Flare on January 06, 2009, 12:23:01 pm
PvTNooB aka Lucifer
[Sn]Lucifer? :o

Yes.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on January 06, 2009, 12:42:18 pm
:O
Yayaya NIce ;D HE's BACK!!"!! Luuuuuciii


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on January 06, 2009, 03:51:59 pm
hattensever

what?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 06, 2009, 04:16:53 pm
hattensever
what?
That "word" makes no sense at all. Better just to ignore it. Sever = hack off, cut, separate, that's all I understood.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 06, 2009, 04:51:37 pm
hattensever
what?
That "word" makes no sense at all. Better just to ignore it. Sever = hack off, cut, separate, that's all I understood.
it should be hatsever


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: QuiverS on January 06, 2009, 08:45:26 pm
epic topic


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on January 06, 2009, 11:04:54 pm
When I joined GG I left A for it. Sounds stupid but it wasn't. I feel myself much better with players like rakkula.  8) I didnt see anything as bad as some people are saying  >:( i've played alot and i can say this clan is for me so long it lives :)
Rakkulaedit: I took the franchise to fix your grammar  ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 07, 2009, 10:25:56 am
I feel myself much better with players like rakkula.
Do you mean I suck? You feel like a better player when you play with people that aren't as good?  :) I'll catch up with your skills in no time
8) I didnt see anything as bad as some people are saying  >:( i've played alot and i can say this clan is for me so long it lives :)
Same here. Those players who have joined GG like being in it. O"Neill was an exeption because he left solely due to whine. Many of our members are also old gaming friends. For instance, currently we have 3 ex-AwE:s in the clan.
    I've also given members a lot rights. eg, all members can start a cw + Karmen can take players into trial. Yet it's up to me and Jack to decide who gets in (in 99% of cases that's completely my decision though). Moreover, members can cw as much as they want. No restrictions on that one.

Futhermore, I'd love to gather all re-usable leftovers from other clans! If you think you're good enough, just pm me  ;)

Btw, it seems that this thread is reaching epic proportions  ;D

(http://static.pyzam.com/img/funnypics/d/dogdoodo.jpg)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on January 07, 2009, 01:59:16 pm
By the way who is that Seppoo? I think it is SkelZ.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 07, 2009, 03:42:34 pm
By the way who is that Seppoo? I think it is SkelZ.
I have no idea. Frankly, I don't care as long as he plays well  :)

This is how my future wife will look like:
(http://www.lolpix.com/banners/lol120A.jpg)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on January 07, 2009, 04:40:00 pm
:DD  ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 07, 2009, 04:46:38 pm
I promoted Lucifer and Sentry to full members. That was fast, huh?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Kristoffer on January 07, 2009, 05:53:01 pm
That was fast, huh?

what was fast?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: ONeill on January 07, 2009, 06:07:10 pm
That was fast, huh?

what was fast?
Their trial time ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 08, 2009, 04:39:42 pm
[GG] 1-2 [WvW] Well...good games. I played awfully though. Seppoo, however, demonstrated some of the best playing I've ever seen at end of the last round.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Perkele on January 08, 2009, 05:20:32 pm


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Xandoz on January 08, 2009, 05:22:57 pm


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Karmen. on January 08, 2009, 05:32:44 pm
Liars  :o


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on January 19, 2009, 06:59:50 pm
Lucifer is WSF now...

Bad week for GG..


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 20, 2009, 08:40:01 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-1 {Q} Couldn't update resently so here we go. Didn't know how those games were cos' I wasn't there.

GJ

Lucifer left and apparently joined WSF. Whatever...


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on January 20, 2009, 09:19:38 pm
[GG] 2-1 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-1 {Q} Couldn't update resently so here we go. Didn't know how those games were cos' I wasn't there.

GJ

Lucifer left and apparently joined WSF. Whatever...

Q vs GG 2-0
Q vs GG 2-1
Q vs GG 2-1.

Guess Karmen didnt remember to tell you about these =)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: SorZ on January 20, 2009, 10:47:03 pm
Here is the total statistics of {Q} vs. [GG] so far.

406# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-1
408# {Q} vs. [GG] 0-2 <-This one is not in GG thread!  >:(
409# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-1
411# {Q} vs. [GG] 1-2
418# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
420# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
421# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
424# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
427# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-1
428# {Q} vs. [GG] 1-2
429# {Q} vs. [GG] 0-2
444# {Q} vs. [GG] 1-2
448# {Q} vs. [GG] 1-2
449# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-1
453# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
456# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
467# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-1
468# {Q} vs. [GG] 1-2
477# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
484# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-0
487# {Q} vs. [GG] 2-1
491# {Q} vs. [GG] 1-2

Clanwars played ~ 22
Won by {Q} ~ 14
Won by [GG] ~ 8

Total score between the clans so far

{Q}   34
[GG]  22


________________________________________
Happy to help

Edit:
[GG] 2-1 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-1 {Q}
Couldn't update resently so here we go. Didn't know how those games were cos' I wasn't there.

GJ

Lucifer left and apparently joined WSF. Whatever...
I don't know exactly in which order since you have screwed it up here, all I know is that 3 of those ^ is fantasy.
Take a look at my statistics yourself.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on January 21, 2009, 12:48:16 pm
Wow, that reminds me of [aC] vs. [FoH] cw's 2007. CWtards x)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Johnnyy on January 21, 2009, 01:36:41 pm
Wow, that reminds me of [aC] vs. [FoH] cw's 2007. CWtards x)

Thor, do you have something to say us? Seems that you're always intervening everytime when Q's has some problems with the other clans :D Even this is not so serious business. ;D

* Sry had a bad day *


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Thor on January 21, 2009, 01:39:28 pm
I'm always interested at my old clans. ;> And indeed I wasn't so serious either. xd

*sry i have a bad day too, i'm ill*

But I have to say that it's funny to see other clans being interested of other clans' clanlists. ;d


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 21, 2009, 04:58:53 pm
Err....I don't quite follow. I'll check this from Karmen

Edit: Okay, Karmen was involved in those 4 cws I posted. If there are any others then I don't know. I asked from magma aswell and he wasn't involved in any other cws. I have no idea what clan wars you're talking about Q. Tell me who played in them.
I don't know exactly in which order since you have screwed it up here, all I know is that 3 of those ^ is fantasy.
Take a look at my statistics yourself.
My fantasies are quite different  ;) It's hardly a fantasy if the same dream was shared by both magma and Karmen. Too big a coincidence, eh?

Edit2:  :'( Sentry has left... Whatever


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on January 21, 2009, 05:18:11 pm
This is what happens when you do too many clanwars, ha! :P


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: SorZ on January 21, 2009, 06:10:11 pm
This is what happens when you do too many clanwars, ha! :P
No, this is what happens when you do many clanwars without updating to 100%.

Err....I don't quite follow. I'll check this from Karmen

Edit: Okay, Karmen was involved in those 4 cws I posted. If there are any others then I don't know. I asked from magma aswell and he wasn't involved in any other cws. I have no idea what clan wars you're talking about Q. Tell me who played in them.
I don't know exactly in which order since you have screwed it up here, all I know is that 3 of those ^ is fantasy.
Take a look at my statistics yourself.
My fantasies are quite different  ;) It's hardly a fantasy if the same dream was shared by both magma and Karmen. Too big a coincidence, eh?

Edit2:  :'( Sentry has left... Whatever
All the clanwars between Q and GG is reported in our thread, so the list I posted is correct and nothing else.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 21, 2009, 06:15:45 pm
All the clanwars between Q and GG is reported in our thread, so the list I posted is correct and nothing else.
How can you tell? What makes you so sure you're right and I'm not? I know I could have made a mistake but so could've you. You didn't even comment on how magma and Karmen both gave me exactly the same results. That's just too big a coincidence, huh?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Cizin on January 23, 2009, 06:12:29 am
Because we report Cw's unlike you.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Maxxa on January 23, 2009, 07:49:55 am
Quote
Edit2:  :'( Sentry has left... Whatever

Sentry said that he left cause hes not usefull cause he dont got computer right now and he cant play at my comp that much..


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Ahmed on January 23, 2009, 07:50:19 am
 Cudos to you for thinking that everyone in this community is dumbasses and won't notice a lose. Your clan is just Undercover FoH, Skelz and all you other camp ****s. I hope [AoG] ****s you up good one of these days and you realize you are all terrible players who hide loses.


Edit: To Mr. Hatten;

You have a tendency to warn, ban people who post things in a harsher tone. I was speaking the truth and I do not want to here your whining through pm or anything. So please ignore this post if you don't like it.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: sharsh on January 23, 2009, 08:58:16 am
its not that hard to figure out lk:p i dont know about you but i would rather not cw any runners


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hatten on January 23, 2009, 03:23:10 pm
Edit: To Mr. Hatten;

You have a tendency to warn, ban people who post things in a harsher tone. I was speaking the truth and I do not want to here your whining through pm or anything. So please ignore this post if you don't like it.
I can neither warn nor ban people. I can only delete posts and tell people that they should behave. If that doesn't help the only thing i can do is run to an Admin or a gmod.

I will not comment your post as you probably know what i would say anyway.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 23, 2009, 08:17:30 pm
Cudos to you for thinking that everyone in this community is dumbasses and won't notice a lose. Your clan is just Undercover FoH, Skelz and all you other camp ****s. I hope [AoG] ****s you up good one of these days and you realize you are all terrible players who hide loses.
;D What do you mean by hiding loses and camping? What the hell do you think you know? Have you ever played us? If you haven't, you shouldn't be here making claims which you can't prove to be right through personal experiences.
       I don't think all LXA members are dumbasses. Actually I like the majority in this community. At least you didn't improve your status in my eyes with this post of yours.
       Either this is some awry humour of yours or you're just a stupid brick. Dunno which one is right. Who the hell do you think you are coming to GG thread insulting people like that? I ought to delete your post but for some odd reason I'm not going to do that.

Here's a piece of advice for you: when you talk in this thread you will either use non-insulting tone and you will back up what you say, or get the **** out...

I was speaking the truth and I do not want to here your whining through pm or anything. So please ignore this post if you don't like it.
Lol, you're asking a mod to ingore your post? You might have been talking the truth which you consider to be the truth, but yet you've backed up your opinions with nothing.

I won't stand language use like that in this thread again.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: iliera on January 24, 2009, 01:07:10 am
god u guys need a dictionary -.-
"I won't stand language use like that in this thread again."
okok you don't, you are making my days here
BIAS -.-

EditRakkula: I fixed my own bad. It's that, not the


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: sharsh on January 24, 2009, 03:54:40 am
gj foh gj...


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Ahmed on January 24, 2009, 04:31:26 am
I won't stand language use like the in this thread again.


Here's a piece of advice for you: when you talk in this thread you will either use non-insulting tone and you will back up what you say, or get the **** out...

Yeah, before you tell others what you stand for, decide whether or not you are just bullshitting or actually have that as a moral.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 24, 2009, 11:05:20 am
Yeah, before you tell others what you stand for, decide whether or not you are just bullshitting or actually have that as a moral.
Notice that the word **** wasn't there to insult you but to emphasize the meaning (actually I could've said gtfo but the meaning is still the same.). It's a different matter if you insult others and swears alone  won't make an insult.
     If you check the sentence you'll notice that the word wasn't directed at you. You can ofc say **** in this thread, but how you use that word makes all the difference.

god u guys need a dictionary -.-
What do you mean?
gj foh gj...
Huh?

Edit: One gotta love internet debate. The coolest thing is that whenever someone else is right you can simply ignore that part of the message and comment on the things you can without ever having to admit you're wrong. Awesome! (Irrelevant)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on January 24, 2009, 11:53:03 am
Seppoo is inactive or what?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 24, 2009, 11:53:43 am
Seppoo is inactive or what?
He's around

Here are the screenshots for those 4 cws Q says didn't happen. They're in some order, not in exactly the right one though, but they should suffice.
The results were, and still are:
[GG] 2-1 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-0 {Q}
[GG] 2-1 {Q}

Edit: One pic is missing though. That's the pic of the first game out of those 4.

(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/820/lierox0ay9.th.jpg) (http://img205.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox0ay9.jpg)
(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8627/lierox1xx9.th.jpg) (http://img205.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox1xx9.jpg)
(http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/9766/lierox6hr4.th.jpg) (http://img159.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox6hr4.jpg)
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/7549/lierox7av1.th.jpg) (http://img510.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox7av1.jpg)
(http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/8430/lierox8hg4.th.jpg) (http://img144.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox8hg4.jpg)
(http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/3057/lierox9bp5.th.jpg) (http://img159.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox9bp5.jpg)
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/1263/lierox10uz9.th.jpg) (http://img510.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox10uz9.jpg)
(http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/1854/lierox18ib4.th.jpg) (http://img144.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox18ib4.jpg)
(http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/9911/lierox19ep1.th.jpg) (http://img144.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lierox19ep1.jpg)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on January 24, 2009, 12:40:53 pm
Gj.  :-X


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 24, 2009, 12:49:37 pm
Gj.  :-X
What's so funny?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on January 24, 2009, 01:11:35 pm
Gj.  :-X
What's so funny?
Eh, rakkula.... Gj = ? i just wonder..
No other than rakkula answer please ^^


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on January 24, 2009, 01:12:29 pm
Gj.  :-X
What's so funny?
funny?
Gj=good job
 :-X = lips sealed.
if u didn't know..
( i had to answer, sry huggle)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on January 24, 2009, 01:43:09 pm
Gj.  :-X
What's so funny?
funny?
Gj=good job
 :-X = lips sealed.
if u didn't know..
( i had to answer, sry huggle)
You had to ruin it?
I just wonder what he would answer ^^


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Lodur on January 24, 2009, 02:02:16 pm
I never said those cw:s didnt happen. They did. But we also won you 3 times =P

So the results still are:

Q vs GG 2-0
Q vs GG 2-1 x2

As long as those cw:s are not in your list then we wont add any of them either :O Or maybe only the ones we won like you do =)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on January 25, 2009, 11:12:32 am
I never said those cw:s didnt happen. They did. But we also won you 3 times =P
Whaaa!? Who was playing and when?  ???
As long as those cw:s are not in your list then we wont add any of them either :O Or maybe only the ones we won like you do =)
Yeah, whatever. I'll sort this out...

Edit:Code, I just thought that smiley ( :-X) ment holding a laugh. Well...now I know what it means. Nevermind that
Edit2:Damn I like deleting Syphons posts


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: miri on January 25, 2009, 06:39:05 pm
Yes, you indeed do.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on January 25, 2009, 10:03:30 pm
Rakkula, i just wonder if i post a post in this thread i have to copy it? or it will be deleted?  :-*
xD yeah i know, i am bored

Nice screens to ^^


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on February 07, 2009, 01:01:32 pm
rakkula is trial in Sn :O


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Michiel on February 07, 2009, 01:25:12 pm
GG is dead now, rakkula said


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on February 07, 2009, 01:43:23 pm
rakkula is trial in Sn :O
Rakkula is in Sn as a trial Code. every one has a chance to change. But of course. If he is lame and whine he wont pass the trial time. It is that simple


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Erwan on February 07, 2009, 01:47:48 pm
So GG is dead now.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Griffin on February 07, 2009, 02:19:03 pm
rakkula is trial in Sn :O
Rakkula is in Sn as a trial Code. every one has a chance to change. But of course. If he is lame and whine he wont will pass the trial time. It is that simple
Corrected. Isn't it right now Phil?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Rakkula on February 08, 2009, 02:41:48 pm
Rakkula is in Sn as a trial Code. every one has a chance to change. But of course. If he is lame and whine he wont will pass the trial time. It is that simple
Corrected. Isn't it right now Phil?
Yes, it's right now...

Btw, I don't care whether Sn wins or loses 'cos it's not my clan. I was upset about losing because I wanted my clan to fare well. Since Sn isn't my clan it's not that big a deal.

And I don't whine, camp or play lame. Those who say that are the whiners...


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on February 08, 2009, 02:49:39 pm
Btw, I don't care whether Sn wins or loses 'cos it's not my clan. I was upset about losing because I wanted my clan to fare well. Since Sn isn't my clan it's not that big a deal.

So, you are not in Sn after all? Or how can you be a member of a clan and think it's not 'your' clan? I don't think clans are something that belong to their leaders alone, they should be a bunch of people who all feel they are an important part of the clan. It just won't work otherwise, and of course in Sn's case there are also a lot of other reasons which prevent it from working.

Good luck in Sn as long as it lasts (not long). 8)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on February 08, 2009, 02:54:59 pm
Btw, I don't care whether Sn wins or loses 'cos it's not my clan. I was upset about losing because I wanted my clan to fare well. Since Sn isn't my clan it's not that big a deal.

So, you are not in Sn after all? Or how can you be a member of a clan and think it's not 'your' clan? I don't think clans are something that belong to their leaders alone, they should be a bunch of people who all feel they are an important part of the clan. It just won't work otherwise, and of course in Sn's case there are also a lot of other reasons which prevent it from working.

Good luck in Sn as long as it lasts (not long). 8)
Dam, why you dont think it last long sak? Still, silly reason to want to win anyway.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on February 08, 2009, 03:09:53 pm
Dam, why you dont think it last long sak?

Well, it didn't last too long last time either now did it? Somehow I've got this idea that it's a tradition for Lucifer to remake Sn every now and then and then 'quit' for some time. Don't know if this is true though, but I once heard Lucifer say Sn has been remade about 8 times. That should give you some kind of an idea how lasting Sn can be.


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Code on February 08, 2009, 03:13:18 pm
Btw, I don't care whether Sn wins or loses 'cos it's not my clan. I was upset about losing because I wanted my clan to fare well. Since Sn isn't my clan it's not that big a deal.

So, you are not in Sn after all? Or how can you be a member of a clan and think it's not 'your' clan? I don't think clans are something that belong to their leaders alone, they should be a bunch of people who all feel they are an important part of the clan. It just won't work otherwise, and of course in Sn's case there are also a lot of other reasons which prevent it from working.
yes, but every clan is different.
like in Wvw.. all members are equal.
and in Sak.. u are leader and have a bigger responsibility for the clan and your members.
The members are ofc part of the clan, but the leader has the biggest responsibility.

Well, it didn't last too long last time either now did it? Somehow I've got this idea that it's a tradition for Lucifer to remake Sn every now and then and then 'quit' for some time. Don't know if this is true though, but I once heard Lucifer say Sn has been remade about 8 times. That should give you some kind of an idea how lasting Sn can be.
maybe, but they have fun,they play many cws and they are very active, so maybe it's worth it, even if the clan dies tomorrow(which i don't hope):)
for them it's a good clan and they have fun in it, and isn't that the most importand thing with a game? ;)


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Sakmongkol on February 08, 2009, 03:24:35 pm
yes, but every clan is different.
Yeah but still, I feel Sak is as much my clan as KKO!, LaG, Q and Vou were, to name a few. When I'm in a clan, no matter what position, of course I feel some responsibility for the whole clan. And I always want the clan I'm currently in to fare well, unlike Rakkula: he said he wanted GG to fare well, but with Sn it's not that big a deal. I think that kind of view on being in a clan is wrong and not lasting.

maybe, but they have fun,they play many cws and they are very active, so maybe it's worth it, even if the clan dies tomorrow(which i don't hope):)
for them it's a good clan and they have fun in it, and isn't that importand with a game? ;)
Sure they can have fun, I won't deny that, but maybe they should think if the other people in the community are having fun, watching their clan come and go and play lame and act really careless and childish. But really I was only predicting that Sn won't last long, and Huggle seemed to doubt my prediction. As Huggle is (I believe) a member of Sn, and I feel really sorry for him for that, I felt it was necessary to take a look at Sn's history to justify my prediction. Really, if a clan has died somewhere around 8 times, what chances does it have to stay alive this time?


Title: Re: Garlic Grunts - [GG]
Post by: Hugglebunny on February 08, 2009, 03:28:40 pm
yes, but every clan is different.
Yeah but still, I feel Sak is as much my clan as KKO!, LaG, Q and Vou were, to name a few. When I'm in a clan, no matter what position, of course I feel some responsibility for the whole clan. And I always want the clan I'm currently in to fare well, unlike Rakkula: he said he wanted GG to fare well, but with Sn it's not that big a deal. I think that kind of view on being in a clan is wrong and not lasting.

maybe, but they have fun,they play many cws and they are very active, so maybe it's worth it, even if the clan dies tomorrow(which i don't hope):)
for them it's a good clan and they have fun in it, and isn't that importand with a game? ;)
Sure they can have fun, I won't deny that, but maybe they should think if the other people in the community are having fun, watching their clan come and go and play lame and act really careless and childish. But really I was only predicting that Sn won't last long, and Huggle seemed to doubt my prediction. As Huggle is (I believe) a member of Sn, and I feel really sorry for him for that, I felt it was necessary to take a look at Sn's history to justify my prediction. Really, if a clan has died somewhere around 8 times, what chances does it have to stay alive this time?
Hehe, Sak: This is not a remake of a clan, but we simply like the tag. So what if it die if all members get inactive. Then it is no point being in a clan, if they are inactive. 

Oh i forgot this: If a member begin to be lame and camp and stuff like that, he get warned. If he still do it he get kicked. This is different from the other Sn clan


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 20, 2009, 05:54:08 pm
I've got some awesome news for some, horrible for some.

GG is back, now with a new name though. From now on we're Dead On Arrival, or [DoA]. Leader is ME, Trusted members Magma and Karmen.

We're re-opening our recruit and we'll stay around for a long time

And it's a good thing those moderators didn't realize GG was dead so it never got locked!


Welcome DoA, you can modify your first post by pressing the modify button.


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Code on February 20, 2009, 06:14:17 pm
ah good choise :) good luck then =)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Michiel on February 20, 2009, 06:42:31 pm
Cool, Good luck.
(Rakkula, you should have join Sn:P)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 20, 2009, 07:01:11 pm
(Rakkula, you should have join Sn:P)
What do you mean? I already joined Sn...then left.

Time to go member stealing!


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on February 20, 2009, 07:13:06 pm
(Rakkula, you should have join Sn:P)
What do you mean? I already joined Sn...then left.

Time to go member stealing!
I suppose he mean that you should stayed in Sn  ;)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 20, 2009, 07:58:25 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sn]

Aaahh...There's no better way to start a clan than kick the crap out of the previous you were in!  8)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: BakTer on February 20, 2009, 10:08:03 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sn]

Aaahh...There's no better way to start a clan than kick the crap out of the previous you were in!  8)

thats only because i didnt play  ;)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Karmen. on February 20, 2009, 10:13:26 pm
HERE WE GO (; and I can say im BACK IN ACTION! :p


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Laku on February 20, 2009, 10:41:33 pm
Good Luck [DoA] :) !

Btw why it's Dead On Arrival.
Why it's not Dead on Arrival?


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: iliera on February 20, 2009, 10:47:16 pm
and i'm wondering, why such a name?
it's like "dead guys are coming"
in my honest opinion, Death on Arrival fits better ;)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Sahweet on February 20, 2009, 11:59:58 pm
Good luck, but I'm wondering where you got the name from? :D

Perhaps from that 'Fallout Boy' band's song 'Dead on Arrival'? :D


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: IRC on February 21, 2009, 01:39:35 am
and i'm wondering, why such a name?
it's like "dead guys are coming"
in my honest opinion, Death on Arrival fits better ;)

It's nice it's like dead on arrival like what you get is a bodybag. I think it's a cool tag meaning tho it will die like the rest, or perhaps its undead:O. Anyways any clan Rakkula is in or made will die, it's so predicable. Hail satan


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on February 21, 2009, 09:03:18 am
mm, this is one of this couple months clans.. :/
I am sure it won't live for long, since GG failed so I think this new GG will fail too. :)

My apologizes. :(


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Karmen. on February 21, 2009, 10:11:35 am
Garlic Grunts died entirely cuz we didnt see each others and had no time to play LORO :s no one of us will never leave (Me, Rakkula and magma) So another members can leave but clan will not die ! AAAMEN


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on February 21, 2009, 10:29:08 am
Garlic Grunts died entirely cuz we didnt see each others and had no time to play LORO :s no one of us will never leave (Me, Rakkula and magma) So another members can leave but clan will not die ! AAAMEN
So why did Blister leave last time?  ;)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Umistand on February 21, 2009, 10:45:14 am
Garlic Grunts died entirely cuz we didnt see each others and had no time to play LORO :s no one of us will never leave (Me, Rakkula and magma) So another members can leave but clan will not die ! AAAMEN
So why did Blister leave last time?  ;)
I think thats the reason Huggle, L2Read =P


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on February 21, 2009, 10:58:05 am
Garlic Grunts died entirely cuz we didnt see each others and had no time to play LORO :s no one of us will never leave (Me, Rakkula and magma) So another members can leave but clan will not die ! AAAMEN
So why did Blister leave last time?  ;)
I think thats the reason Huggle, L2Read =P
Yeah, but the same can happen again xD ( most likly)


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Umistand on February 21, 2009, 12:11:17 pm
Garlic Grunts died entirely cuz we didnt see each others and had no time to play LORO :s no one of us will never leave (Me, Rakkula and magma) So another members can leave but clan will not die ! AAAMEN
So why did Blister leave last time?  ;)
I think thats the reason Huggle, L2Read =P
Yeah, but the same can happen again xD ( most likly)
Thats pretty obvious yeah, but anyways not to go fully offtopic.

Good luck [DoA]!11!!1


Title: Re: Dead On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 21, 2009, 05:57:44 pm
I am sure it won't live for long, since GG failed so I think this new GG will fail too. :)
The only reason why the first GG "failed" was because I thought I didn't have the time to manage it. You should consider the "death" as more of a pause. The previous clan was no where close to dying when I left. The bad thing was though, that at the same time so many other clans emerged causing us to lose members.
Perhaps from that 'Fallout Boy' band's song 'Dead on Arrival'? :D
Neva heard of it...
Yeah, but the same can happen again xD ( most likly)
Obviously. Sooner or later I'll say goodbyes to liero but that might be years from now. Maybe I'll find someone else to host the clan then.

And yes, Huggle, I meant bashing the crap out of the previous clan I was in...

And thanks to iliera for making a remark about the name. I slightly tweaked it  :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on February 21, 2009, 10:54:14 pm
Gl DoA ..(nostalgic xD)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 22, 2009, 06:18:43 pm
[DoA] 2-0 {Q}
Blister, Karmen <100lt, FF> jage, Lodur
Blister, Karmen <20lt, lfr> Lodur, Johnyy

Good games!  :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 26, 2009, 08:04:12 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
[DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
[DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
[DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
 ;D Good games...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on February 26, 2009, 08:23:02 pm
XDDD Good job ;D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: iliera on February 26, 2009, 08:33:18 pm
i'm wondering
Quote
The bad thing was though, that at the same time so many other clans emerged causing us to lose members.
what clans effected GG members then?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 26, 2009, 08:37:28 pm
~A~ Took Nelli, Lucifer left for Sn and Sentry made his own clan with Cortex



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 27, 2009, 06:44:51 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Osp]
[DoA] 1-2 ~A~
A played lame (At least Leonheart). I didn't like those games  :-\
All those who call us lamers; blow me. We played fair, some in A didn't


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Flare on February 27, 2009, 06:46:42 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Osp]
[DoA] 1-2 ~A~
A played lame (At least Leonheart). I didn't like those games  :-\
All those who call us lamers; blow me. We played fair, some in A didn't

Of course your clan didnt.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on February 27, 2009, 06:47:18 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Osp]
[DoA] 1-2 ~A~
A played lame (At least Leonheart). I didn't like those games  :-\
All those who call us lamers; blow me. We played fair, some in A didn't
HUH!?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on February 27, 2009, 06:54:40 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Osp]
[DoA] 1-2 ~A~
A played lame (At least Leonheart). I didn't like those games  :-\
All those who call us lamers; blow me. We played fair, some in A didn't
/care


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lablad on February 27, 2009, 07:01:26 pm
Holy shit guys , you fail <.< .... I msnd thru the whole cw and i said you could shoot me if you caught me off guard and you DID  , so do not go saying about being unfair


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 27, 2009, 07:08:57 pm
Holy shit guys , you fail <.< .... I msnd thru the whole cw and i said you could shoot me if you caught me off guard and you DID  , so do not go saying about being unfair
What? I knew he was afk at one point but he never said anything, so we can't know if he was playing or not. And I go on saying Leon played lame...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on February 27, 2009, 07:22:36 pm
Usually you can shoot him IF he don't say "pause", "stop" etc.. -.-


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on February 27, 2009, 07:44:10 pm
FFS guys. All know that both clans are like lame. So if you dont like it dont cw them .... Stop the shitty whining


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 27, 2009, 07:47:53 pm
FFS guys. All know that both clans are like lame. So if you dont like it dont cw them .... Stop the shitty whining
I only said my opinion once. You're the one keeping this up. Since when does "knowing" equal truth?

[DoA] 1-2 [WvW]They were really good games. In the last round we were leading a lot but then tightly lost due to Ceasar's running :D Whatever. Good games


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on February 28, 2009, 02:52:21 pm
[DoA] 1-2 ~A~Pretty good games.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 02, 2009, 03:56:42 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [aR]
[DoA] 1-1 [aR]Good games. I liked playing against aR
Woot! Triple post


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 05, 2009, 05:28:52 pm
[DoA] 1-2 {Q}  :-\ Good games. But I wanna win...

Tetra post, yippee...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 05, 2009, 06:04:27 pm
now you dont get a 5 post xD
Yeah I do. I deleted your post and now replied to it! Hohohoo

Penta post!  :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 05, 2009, 06:09:15 pm
Is worth a permaban imo
lol, what's so bad about it? My thread, my rules!

Heksa post....I'll stop now. A deka post would be nice though

(http://lxalliance.net/forum/Themes/7dana_TP/images/warnwarn.gif) Your thread is not above the LXA rules. Multi-posting is forbidden. Some time has passed between most of your posts but last few posts were only fooling around and abusing your thread mod powers. Do not let this happen again.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on March 05, 2009, 07:44:05 pm
Atleast no 7 post!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Code on March 05, 2009, 08:08:10 pm
Is worth a permaban imo
lol, what's so bad about it? My thread, my rules!
i'd rather say: their forum, their rules ;)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 06, 2009, 05:57:17 pm
[DoA] 2-1 {Q} I'm happy now  :P
Good games... SorZ said we played lame, don't listen to him. He's just jealous of our leetness!

Edit:  :D I knew I was gonna get smited for saying that. -1 and +1 so far


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: miri on March 07, 2009, 10:15:24 am
Even though I did not play in that cw and I don't really care whether you lost or won, it is very arrogant to say that the opposing clan got OWNED.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Code on March 07, 2009, 10:22:34 am
it is very arrogant to say that the opposing clan got OWNED.
when did he say that? ;o
ofc they are happy to win versus Q. Q is a skilled clan, and they havn't won u to much..
and i think this "jealous of our leetness" thing wasn't 100% serious.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 07, 2009, 03:21:30 pm
...it is very arrogant to say that the opposing clan got OWNED.
I never said that, just like Code said.
..."jealous of our leetness" thing wasn't 100% serious.
Nope, it was not  8) That leetness thing was a response to SorZ's comments and was in no way an indication that you were owned in that cw.

[DoA] 2-0 {Q}Good games  8)
[DoA] 1-2 ~A~  :-\


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 08, 2009, 07:12:52 pm
[DoA] 0-2 {Q}  :-X :-\ :'(


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on March 08, 2009, 07:44:14 pm
[DoA] 0-2 {Q}  :-X :-\ :'(

Welcome to our group: "ASSKICKED BY {Q}UALITY."


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 13, 2009, 07:05:03 pm
[DoA] 2-0 ~A~That was a lame forfeit by A. We consider this as 2-0 win. This is exactly why I don't like playing agains ~A~: They do everything to win... far more of what were willing.

And Freekill now joins DoA as a trial member  8) I'm pretty sure he'll fit in here just fine

Edit: I'll lighten things up a little more... Some A member said pause...while moving and just like a second or two before getting killed inevitably.
         It shows poor "sportsmanship" to say pause just before getting killed, especially when it's inevitable. Most players at least have the courtesy of playing that situation to its end before saying that. It's not possible someone can't play a second or two longer until saying that. This only shows what A is ready to do in order to win. Moreover, it's just not possible to react that fast. Ppl don't constantly look at the chat box but instead concentrate on playing
         Anyways, after this A claimed that either Karmen should suicide or it counts as 2-0 victory for A. When the argue didn't seem to draw to a close, A quitted their server claiming we forfeit. Obviously we didn't so it's a 2-0 win for us... The core problem was that instead of talking A just quitted their server, unwilling to discuss it further.
        To conclude,  ~A~ are a bunch of whine ass lamers (O"Neill excluded though). That's also the reason why I don't like playing them. Rant closed!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: miri on March 13, 2009, 07:47:28 pm
Quote
This is exactly why I don't like playing agains ~A~: They do everything to win...

[DoA] 1-2 {Q}  :-\ Good games. But I wanna win...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 13, 2009, 07:50:20 pm
Quote
This is exactly why I don't like playing agains ~A~: They do everything to win...
[DoA] 1-2 {Q}  :-\ Good games. But I wanna win...
Just this once, I'm not going to delete your post. You're thinking I contradicted myself, eh? You should learn to read, Syph. Even if I like winning and want to win, it doesn't mean I would do anything to reach that goal. At least what I'm ready to do is very little in comparison to A's laming.



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: miri on March 13, 2009, 07:52:37 pm
Calm down or I'm gonna have to frag you


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 13, 2009, 07:54:26 pm
Calm down or I'm gonna have to frag you
I am calm. I don't really know what you're trying to accomplish with that.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on March 13, 2009, 09:08:31 pm
And Freekill now joins DoA as a trial member  8) I'm pretty sure he'll fit in here just fine


> My anwser
Yay good luck Freekill



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 14, 2009, 03:32:49 pm
[DoA] 0-2 {Q}
Rakkula, Fr33kill ~ Nack, Lodur, Laku
[DoA] 2-0 {Q}
Rakkula, Fr33kill ~ Lodur, Laku, Nack, Jage

To stir things up a little bit: Q got a little pissed 'cos we won them in wh40k  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on March 14, 2009, 04:18:18 pm
[DoA] 0-2 {Q}
Rakkula, Fr33kill ~ Nack, Lodur, Laku
[DoA] 2-0 {Q}
Rakkula, Fr33kill ~ Lodur, Laku, Nack, Jage

To stir things up a little bit: Q got a little pissed 'cos we won them in wh40k  8)
You ran or not!? If you did not your good =) If you did your lame xD


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 14, 2009, 04:20:47 pm
You ran or not!? If you did not your good =) If you did your lame xD
I wouldn't say I ran... All rounds were more or less lame. Both sides did some lame tricks from time to time. If I'm lame, so is Q (and ofc I'm not lame which means that Q isn't lame either  8))


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on March 14, 2009, 04:35:03 pm
I wouldnt say you really ran or camp either. I just dont like the way you play in mods like Food or MSF where you combo all your weapons and then flee somewhere and reload. It gets really annoying you know ;)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Sakmongkol on March 14, 2009, 04:41:20 pm
then flee somewhere and reload

Duhh, that is running!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 14, 2009, 05:03:50 pm
...where you combo all your weapons and then flee somewhere and reload. It gets really annoying you know ;)
Yeah, you're right about that. It can be a bit annoying. It'd hard to kick that habit after palkeo's  ;D
Duhh, that is running!
Running in irl terms or running in the terms of gaming? It's running in a way, but I'd rather call it performing fire & reload tactics  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Sakmongkol on March 14, 2009, 06:41:21 pm
It's running in a way

I don't think it's very clever to even try to distinguish many kinds of running. If you waste your weapons too quickly, you will need more time to reload them and ofcourse it's not wise to stay close to your enemy then, thus you are forced to run. The only way to play without running is to stay at some kind of a firing distance from your enemy at all times, even when reloading, but of course it is questionable whether anyone really plays according to this principle.

Can you see where this leads us? You're all hypocrites =)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 14, 2009, 07:02:36 pm
Yes, Monco, we're all hypocrites... including you 8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on March 14, 2009, 07:09:47 pm
That just depend on how much you wanna win ;) Run reload, hide, camp in long distances or simply just hide in small distances. That is also a way to reload your weaponds on  ;D running = not stand there and be killed like a dumie


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Griffin on March 14, 2009, 07:59:36 pm
The only way to play without running is to stay at some kind of a firing distance from your enemy at all times, even when reloading, but of course it is questionable whether anyone really plays according to this principle.
Now I get it! You all kill me because I have the useless tactic!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 14, 2009, 08:44:34 pm
DoA vs T3 0 - 2
liero1.0 100lt Jukke, magma and karma
msf in ff, karma and me


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 15, 2009, 11:52:45 am
Fr33kill is now a full member. Congratulations! 8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on March 15, 2009, 12:25:13 pm
Congratulations Fkill!!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Ruki on March 15, 2009, 12:56:46 pm
There is probably plenty more missing to add here on the list, lets start from March, because it is March at the moment:
March: FreakZ
April: [gA]
April: [Oz]
June: [dP]
July: [Ta]
November: [pFe]
January: [Sak]
March: [DoA]

Congratulations, Fr33kill. I'm sure this clan is the one!!!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on March 15, 2009, 01:23:55 pm
There is probably plenty more missing to add here on the list, lets start from March, because it is March at the moment:
March: FreakZ
April: [gA]
April: [Oz]
June: [dP]
July: [Ta]
November: [pFe]
January: [Sak]
March: [DoA]

Congratulations, Fr33kill. I'm sure this clan is the one!!!
What is that list??


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 15, 2009, 01:24:28 pm
[DoA] 2-0 UTIGood games

What is that list??
I'm guessing it's the list of Fkill's previous clans  :D

Edit: [DoA] 2-0 UTI


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on March 15, 2009, 01:37:05 pm
hahaha. In that case nice list ruki xD


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Karmen. on March 15, 2009, 01:38:49 pm
Its ok to me that dude is in. sure he knows if he leaves theres no way coming back  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 15, 2009, 02:31:27 pm
There is probably plenty more missing to add here on the list, lets start from March, because it is March at the moment:
March: FreakZ
April: [gA]
April: [Oz]
June: [dP]
July: [Ta]
November: [pFe]
January: [Sak]
March: [DoA]

Congratulations, Fr33kill. I'm sure this clan is the one!!!
Nice list u made ;D but I was in pfe 2times once it was mort clan too, you cant find out that from lxa thou.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Griffin on March 15, 2009, 07:55:33 pm
Another + Karma for Pixy! Darnit, i really gotta start posting!
Or you could stop playing cws! No? Oh okay then..


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lucifer on March 16, 2009, 09:00:18 am
Or you could stop playing cws! No? Oh okay then..
Never stop cw! Cw rooooxx!  :-*


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 16, 2009, 05:20:19 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Sn] I wasn't playing but I'm sure the games sucked 'cos we lost...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on March 16, 2009, 05:21:36 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Sn] I wasn't playing but I'm sure the games sucked 'cos we lost...
Huh?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 16, 2009, 05:24:42 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Sn] I wasn't playing but I'm sure the games sucked 'cos we lost...
Huh?
Do'h, I fixed it. I mixed the numbers. I'm so used to typing 2-0 rather than 0-2 that I always seem to fail when I have to type such awful things  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: iliera on March 16, 2009, 05:28:37 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Sn] I wasn't playing but I'm sure the games sucked 'cos we lost...

obviously.. but maybe DoA lost because u werent playing?...

anyway nice recruit, freekill fits nicely in DoA imo


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on March 16, 2009, 05:38:40 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Sn] I wasn't playing but I'm sure the games sucked 'cos we lost...

obviously.. but maybe DoA lost because u werent playing?...

anyway nice recruit, freekill fits nicely in DoA imo
I totally agree with you here, my dear friend iLiera, Fkill is a very nice guy with an awesome attitude!
He never whines or camps and the best thing is he neeeever runs! That's what everyone expects from DoA! You rock!
NOTNOTNOTNOTNOT


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 16, 2009, 06:47:36 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
[DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]
[DoA] 2-0 [Sun~]

Good games  8) Sun is fun to play against


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 17, 2009, 06:43:59 pm
DoA vs Sn 2-0
Sn set: ff ff.
DoA set: lfr classic.
luci huggle yeha and bakter played cant remember in wich rounds. me magma and karma from doa



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: BakTer on March 17, 2009, 07:02:46 pm
DoA vs Sn 2-0
Sn set: ff ff. magma,karma,me - huggle,luci,yeha
DoA set: lfr classic.  -//-



forgot me?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 17, 2009, 07:21:17 pm
DoA vs Sn 2-0
Sn set: ff ff. magma,karma,me - huggle,luci,yeha
DoA set: lfr classic.  -//-



forgot me?
yeah fixed it



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 18, 2009, 05:59:32 pm


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on March 18, 2009, 06:10:33 pm


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 18, 2009, 06:38:06 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sn]Oh yeah, oh yeah! Suck it long, suck it hard!  8)

[DoA] 2-0 .Cp Good games


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 20, 2009, 05:06:24 pm
[DoA] 2-0 .Cp
[DoA] 2-0 .CpGood games 8)

[DoA] 2-0 {Q}Good games. Less whining the next time though, okay?

Oh and I don't like very much being called a ****ing moron and a r-e-t-a-r-d in a cw. Stop that pathetic calling-you-with-names game of yours (he-who-must-not-be-named). Whatever, this probably won't change anything which I already discovered in our pm chat. Grow some balls...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 21, 2009, 03:34:53 pm
[DoA] 0-2 {Q}All games were really tight
[DoA] 1-2 {Q}...and this time Q actually comboed far more than we did


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 22, 2009, 05:13:16 pm
[DoA] 0-2 {Q}All games were really tight
[DoA] 1-2 {Q}...and this time Q actually comboed far more than we did
WE WON ThAT 2ND 1 2-1


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on March 22, 2009, 05:20:58 pm
Lold you idiot, look at the date.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 22, 2009, 05:35:23 pm
oops  :-[

we won 2-1 today i mean


Edit:  yeah      |
                     V


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on March 22, 2009, 05:39:53 pm
and lost 0-2, ty


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 24, 2009, 06:50:28 pm
[DoA] 2-0 {Q}Suck it long, suck it hard!  8)
[DoA] 0-1 {Q}


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 25, 2009, 03:44:48 pm
2 [DoA] v [R] 0
our:msfII ff
their:classic ff


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 26, 2009, 07:26:01 pm
[DoA] 2-1 {Q}We finished one cw


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 27, 2009, 04:43:17 pm
[DoA] 2-0 |LaG|Good games!  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on March 27, 2009, 05:14:30 pm
http://imajr.com/lierox43-1403282

DoA Have a new PWWNER!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Sakmongkol on March 27, 2009, 05:36:50 pm
DoA Have a new PWWNER!

And he is an Israelian! 8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Umistand on March 27, 2009, 05:39:35 pm
DoA Have a new PWWNER!

And he is an Israelian! 8)
Even better, he is an Israelian jaw!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 27, 2009, 06:51:20 pm
[DoA] 2-1 [Osp]We're in flames today  8)

[DoA] 1-1 {Q} Really pathetic behavior from Q. During the morts round they only camped in the caves... still lost. I hope Q wouldn't behave like this in the future. Apparently they didn't like out set but that shouldn't be any justification for such behavior.  :(


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 28, 2009, 06:50:24 pm
[DoA] 1-2 ~A~ Thor's constant whine ruined the game. He's turned into a total dick lately

[DoA] 2-1 {Q} Finished an unfinished cw. Good game


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on March 28, 2009, 10:29:41 pm
DoA vs Sn 0-2
DoA va Q 2-1
Me and karma played i post sets tomorrow now i go to sleep


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 29, 2009, 07:37:07 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [T3]
[DoA] 2-1 [Sn]
[DoA] 0-2 [WvW]


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Cizin on March 30, 2009, 12:55:24 am
I dont see when DoA might have beaten us in our cw list so i need some Pictures to confirm it.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 30, 2009, 11:05:34 am
I dont see when DoA might have beaten us in our cw list so i need some Pictures to confirm it.
I'll get them from Karmen as soon as he gets online.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Frey on March 30, 2009, 04:05:55 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [T3]
[DoA] 2-1 [Sn]
[DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
might want to change that to 0-2


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 30, 2009, 05:10:21 pm
might want to change that to 0-2
Actually I would not. Anyways, at least the color was right. This must be like the 10th time I made that mistake...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: RussG on March 31, 2009, 01:12:48 am
How come, how come I wonder... There might exist colorblind people here @ LXA too, you know?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on March 31, 2009, 06:28:01 pm
[DoA] 1-2 {Q}
[DoA] 0-2 {Q} Good games


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Gigolo on April 01, 2009, 02:28:23 pm
Don't worry Karmen, you come in my thread and talk of posting losses. So I'll help your lazy ass out.
.Cp^ v. [DoA] | 2-0
Round 1
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2610/41rd1.png
Round 2
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/4552/41rd2.png
2nd round only Monco is in server because both left IMMEDIATELY when killed. Good sports these guys are ^_^


Quote
[DoA] 2-0 .Cp
[DoA] 2-0 .CpGood games
Need screens and date plz.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on April 02, 2009, 06:12:17 pm
[DoA] me, magma vs [xD] pig****er, awaken 2-0
[DoA] me, magma vs [xD] pig****er, awaken 2-0

ggs


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Thor on April 02, 2009, 07:02:34 pm
This is the suckiest clan I've ever seen.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Karmen. on April 02, 2009, 07:09:50 pm
This is the suckiest clan I've ever seen.
And this was suckiest comment i've ever seen ;D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on April 02, 2009, 07:31:17 pm
This is the suckiest clan I've ever seen.
And this was suckiest comment i've ever seen ;D

And your the best salkkareiden miro i've ever seen.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 02, 2009, 07:41:34 pm
This is the suckiest clan I've ever seen.
And this was suckiest comment i've ever seen ;D
And your the best salkkareiden miro i've ever seen.
You're sooo correct!  :D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Awaken on April 02, 2009, 08:12:24 pm
This is the suckiest clan I've ever seen.

you mean DoA or [xD]?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on April 02, 2009, 08:16:32 pm
This is the suckiest clan I've ever seen.

you mean DoA or [xD]?
He mean [DoA]


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Puma on April 02, 2009, 08:16:53 pm
This is the suckiest clan I've ever seen.

you mean DoA or [xD]?
Which clan thread
Is he posting in.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 03, 2009, 01:59:37 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sak] Very good games  :)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Michiel on April 03, 2009, 02:01:38 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sak] Very good games  :)

Sorry for posting wrong in the Sak thread, I didnt noticed it :-[


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 03, 2009, 02:02:37 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sak] Very good games  :)
Sorry for posting wrong in the Sak thread, I didnt noticed it :-[
No problemo


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on April 04, 2009, 02:07:41 pm
Rakkula that cap is very becoming to you. Could you maybe show us some more pictures of you? Anyway I like your avatar.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 04, 2009, 02:12:19 pm
Rakkula that cap is very becoming to you. Could you maybe show us some more pictures of you?
:D I'm not going to post my real picture. However, I chose that one because a friend of mine said that, in some ways, I look quite a lot like Gollum.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 04, 2009, 04:01:50 pm
[DoA] 2-1 {Q} Really good games. All rounds were really tight, especially the neutral set  :P

Shit, I almost pissed my loincloth.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on April 04, 2009, 09:09:14 pm
DoA vs Osp 2-1
their set liero1.1 desdome ~Osp. Players: Karma, magma. Turma, Pera
our: morts cs ~DoA. me, magma. Turma, Pera
neutral ~DoA Karma,magma. Turma, Pera


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on April 04, 2009, 09:26:59 pm
DoA vs Osp 2-0
their set liero1.1 desdome ~Osp. Players: Karma, magma. Turma, Pera
our: morts cs ~DoA. me, magma. Turma, Pera
neutral ~DoA Karma,magma. Turma, Pera
nub, 2-1?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on April 04, 2009, 09:29:25 pm
DoA vs Osp 2-0
their set liero1.1 desdome ~Osp. Players: Karma, magma. Turma, Pera
our: morts cs ~DoA. me, magma. Turma, Pera
neutral ~DoA Karma,magma. Turma, Pera
nub, 2-1?
oops  :D you are right


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 05, 2009, 04:15:43 pm
[DoA] 2-1 [T3]
[DoA] 2-1 ~A~
[DoA] 2-0 {Q}
[DoA] 2-1 {Q}

Good job, lads  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 06, 2009, 05:33:55 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Sn]
[DoA] 2-1 |LaG| Good games  :)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on April 06, 2009, 08:04:52 pm
DoA vs A 2-1


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Karmen. on April 06, 2009, 08:54:34 pm
we got pwned WvW 0-2 better luck nextime  ;) ps. i hope we have possibles to win with our full team  :)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 07, 2009, 05:39:56 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [xD]
[DoA] 2-0 [xD]
[DoA] 2-0 {Q}
[DoA] 2-1 ~A~

Good games  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 09, 2009, 04:44:22 pm
[DoA] 1-1 {Q}
This is quite a mess again:
         SorZ whined all the time during the cw calling me a joke and so on. First of all, I hate playing with SorZ due to his whine. It would be so much nicer to play if the opposition wouldn't be calling you assholes, jokes, campers and so on. This kind of behavior only comes up when SorZ or miri is playing: I hope both of them would learn to respect other players and not resort to slandering. From time to time I find SorZ's behavior very offensive which is why I don't like playing against him.
        During the neutral round SorZ started claiming that Freekill was cheating. Of course DoA denies all such accusations without any evidence. I don't know why they started saying that but I hope they won't do it again.
Then Freekill left because he was fulled during a pause and after that I got banned from Q server along with Freekill.

What the f*ck do you think you're doing? Most Q members are fun to play against when SorZ isn't around. That's why I don't condemn the whole clan but I would hope to receive some respect and good behavior from any clan we're playing against.

Here's a quote from Q thread:
We don't see any joy in playing these cws anymore since DoA has shown really bad ”ingame manners” several times -
and especially when we think hacking is involved, so here by I declear DoA as blacklisted.
Which means {Q} won't participate in anymore clanwar activities with DoA.
Do you mind telling me personally what are these bad ingame manners? I haven't insulted or slandered other players in a cw which you seem to be doing all the time. It's seriously the time for you to look in the mirror.
        I would also like you to present some evidence of our hacking, if you somehow happen to have any.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on April 10, 2009, 01:03:55 pm
[DoA] vs. [Sn]
    3     -     2
ggs


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Kristoffer on April 10, 2009, 01:38:34 pm
That's what I thought, you don't need to delete post just because they are negative to you!

As I said, you whine the same - BE SHAME Rak Knulla!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 10, 2009, 01:46:41 pm
That's what I thought, you don't need to delete post just because they are negative to you!
No, I don't. Yet there's nothing that stops me from doing so. I deleted your post because I don't know you: I don't recall seeing you in-game and I reckon you're not involved in the dispute between Q and DoA. Part of the argument was about insulting and slandering the opposing team's members which, in my opinion, I haven't done. Saying things like "die!, wtf?" aren't usually considered offensive, are they? I didn't think so either.



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on April 10, 2009, 01:51:35 pm
nonono namuu sometimes fakes me
Btw ggs it seems!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Kristoffer on April 10, 2009, 02:59:43 pm
That's what I thought, you don't need to delete post just because they are negative to you!
No, I don't. Yet there's nothing that stops me from doing so. I deleted your post because I don't know you: I don't recall seeing you in-game and I reckon you're not involved in the dispute between Q and DoA. Part of the argument was about insulting and slandering the opposing team's members which, in my opinion, I haven't done. Saying things like "die!, wtf?" aren't usually considered offensive, are they? I didn't think so either.



But when you say " die lagger " etc it makes me feel bad. Just because I cant afford to buy a new computer you rich slut!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 10, 2009, 03:03:29 pm
But when you say " die lagger " etc it makes me feel bad. Just because I cant afford to buy a new computer you rich slut!
Oh, so I was insulting your personal wealth? Well sorry about that  :D.
I'm not a rich slut either. I'm not an adult yet, so they still legally own everything.

And who are you called in-game anyways? I don't remember saying that but I might've slipped something like that


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Kristoffer on April 10, 2009, 03:10:24 pm
But when you say " die lagger " etc it makes me feel bad. Just because I cant afford to buy a new computer you rich slut!
Oh, so I was insulting your personal wealth? Well sorry about that  :D.
I'm not a rich slut either. I'm not an adult yet, so they still legally own everything.

And who are you called in-game anyways? I don't remember saying that but I might've slipped something like that

=)

Namura.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 10, 2009, 06:21:56 pm
[DoA] 1-2 [WvW] Good games


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 13, 2009, 01:57:56 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [T3]
[DoA] 1-2 {Q}
[DoA] 0-2 {Q}
[DoA] 1-2 {Q}


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 01, 2009, 11:56:07 am
Well I'll be damned. We didn't lose our records afterall...   :-*

Announcements:
1) None of the clan wars played during LXA being down will be reported. This is simply due to the lack of reliable, personal records.

2) Karmen left DoA for aC. He will be back though as soon as aC dies, which I believe shouldn't take too long.  :P

[DoA] 2-0 [NoM]
[DoA] 2-0 [NoM] Good games

[DoA] 2-1 [aC]  Good games. Had 7 hp left in the end



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on May 02, 2009, 07:37:12 pm
DoA vs AoW 2-0
and i saw DoA vs BANG 2-0 in their thread


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on May 08, 2009, 04:37:05 pm
[DoA] vs [NoM] 2-1
ff ff ~DoA
morts ~NoM
neutral ~DoA
Players: magma,me. kuch, slim


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: miri on May 08, 2009, 04:48:05 pm
RakkulaEdit: I was too stupid to simply quote Miri so I accidentally modified his post. The point is there none the less  :'(

Quote
Then why is the cw with BANG you won reported and not the losses against{Q}?
Huh? I recall that cw was played when LXA was back? Correct me if I'm wrong and I'll delete that cw from the list.

Another announcement:
My internet connection is down for the time being so I'm unable to play for a while. I'll still update all played cws in the first post.
@Freekill, plz inform magma of this.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 10, 2009, 12:06:06 pm
Look above!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: miri on May 10, 2009, 03:00:39 pm
Yes, we played that cw maybe 1-2 days before LXA was back. But it's no big deal, you can have it in your list if you really-really want.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 10, 2009, 03:43:27 pm
Yes, we played that cw maybe 1-2 days before LXA was back. But it's no big deal, you can have it in your list if you really-really want.
No big deal. I just replaced BANG with NoM :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on May 10, 2009, 08:46:48 pm
[DoA] 2-1 [aC]
1st lamda rifles ~aC
DoA's morts ~DoA
neutral ~DoA

[DoA] vs [aC] 2-1 or 1-2 or 1-1 i didnt see ending, cuz i was afk and every1 left after, when I last saw karma and magma had 0lives
aC's whaok ff ~aC
DoA's morts~ DoA


magma said he will be inactive next week


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jihad Joe on May 15, 2009, 12:40:13 pm
[DoA] 2-1 [aC]
1st lamda rifles ~aC
DoA's morts ~DoA
neutral ~DoA

[DoA] vs [aC] 2-1 or 1-2 or 1-1 i didnt see ending, cuz i was afk and every1 left after, when I last saw karma and magma had 0lives
aC's whaok ff ~aC
DoA's morts~ DoA


magma said he will be inactive next week
Guys WE won that game didn't we? We took that 1 on 1 battle and i won it.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on May 15, 2009, 12:56:58 pm
Guys WE won that game didn't we? We took that 1 on 1 battle and i won it.
ok, I was afk so I didnt see how it ended.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: fr33 on May 19, 2009, 09:11:52 pm
DoA v NoM 0-2 and 2-1
ggs


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 22, 2009, 11:16:33 am
List updated.

I'm guessing my connection will be back on within 3 or 4 weeks  :'(
So it's a long break for me. I'll be back though, don't worry


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on May 22, 2009, 11:18:40 am
List updated.

I'm guessing my connection will be back on within 3 or 4 weeks  :'(
So it's a long break for me. I'll be back though, don't worry
A whole month without you!?
Tobad i aint playing so much... So wont enjoy it so much..  ;)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on May 30, 2009, 02:06:30 pm
Too bad for DoA, Magma has leave and join as trial aC. Whatever good luck in the future DoA  ;)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SorZ on June 02, 2009, 10:38:08 pm
Seems like Rakkula is now alone in DoA, since Fr33kill left it.
Too bad.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on June 03, 2009, 12:26:30 am
sad story.. but maybe rakkula can join aC also - i mean.. Q and DoA never were really different(maybe only few exceptions).
though it would have been cooler if noone left DoA and just jage joined DoA?

(http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/2208/5408thumb21679745.jpg) (http://img190.imageshack.us/my.php?image=5408thumb21679745.jpg)



Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on June 03, 2009, 01:12:02 am
So you found a pic of yourself? =D Gratz mate!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on June 03, 2009, 01:33:16 pm
Well I once met your mother in teh internetz

(http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/5524/6621thumb28867489.png) (http://img199.imageshack.us/my.php?image=6621thumb28867489.png)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on June 03, 2009, 02:07:18 pm
Stop this stupid war now, everyone knows that you, Lodur and you, iliera do not get along with each other well, you should talk in MSN instead of making bad jokes in the DoA thread.

I am personally pretty sad that DoA seems to die since I really like to do clan wars with them, Rakkula did not post the nicest comments during clan wars (which actually makes me enjoy victories even more :P) and their playing was not the fairest either, though clan wars with them were always tight and indeed competitve, IMO fun.
I think we all have to agree that DoA played unexpectedly well, they were able to beat every currently existing clan.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on June 03, 2009, 02:38:15 pm
i know you only post here picture about yourself(read first lodur's post for one pic of himself), but i post only moms here.. let me introduce you your mom!
Quote from: Lodur
Yep, im so glad that im out of all that mortar shit and got in good rifle clan at last.. My name is still OP in LXA but im lodur if someone thinks about it.. And i laready asked run to change my name :)
?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on June 03, 2009, 03:44:10 pm
please stop your hurting my feelings :''////


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on June 03, 2009, 03:57:59 pm
please stop your hurting my feelings :''////
i hope this is sarcasm, I didn't want to hurt your feelings..
but i've never had so much fun on LXA,so we need to argue more like that
"untill to next time" :P

Yes it was sarcasm and agreed =D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Sakmongkol on June 03, 2009, 04:29:20 pm
so we need to argue more like that

Excuse me, was there some kind of an argument here? =)

Well, good luck to your next one, and try a little harder with that. I think posting stupid pictures and random insults hardly counts as an argument.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 04, 2009, 01:13:49 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [TES IV]
 
Good games


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on August 04, 2009, 01:31:34 pm
The heck, you cwd alone?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 04, 2009, 01:59:09 pm
The heck, you cwd alone?
Yes  :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Maxxa on August 04, 2009, 02:35:50 pm
1v1 or 1v2? hmm i wanna 1v2 too, against tes iv of course : ;D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 05, 2009, 09:25:24 am
By the way, where is Freekill anyway!? I haven't seen him in msn, in-game or in LXA for a long time. Magma said that he had just disappeared. Maybe his dead or has gone insane or something...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: IRC on August 05, 2009, 09:47:12 am
I saw him in my server yesterday, tagless.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 06, 2009, 10:19:17 am
I saw him in my server yesterday, tagless.
Yeah, I know his tagless now. Odd, didn't see him in msn either. Well, maybe I'll run into him some day

Another issue: I'm trying to get my host working again. No matter what I do in the port forwarding options, it doesn't seem to work. Perhaps someone could help. This is what I should fill up with number and text:

Application: OpenLieroX.exe           Protocol: UDP   
Source IP Address: xxxxxx           Source Netmask: xxxxxx    Destination IP Address: xxxxxx          Destination Netmask: xxxxxx   Destination Port Start: xxxxx          Destination Port End:xxxxx    Destination Port Map:    xxxxxx           

What should I but where the Xes are?

                                                
                                                 
                                   


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: T-Bag on August 06, 2009, 11:53:27 am
Rakkula are u gonna keep DoA up?? 8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Laku on August 06, 2009, 02:34:03 pm


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 06, 2009, 03:44:54 pm
Rakkula are u gonna keep DoA up?? 8)
Unless I get to another (proper) clan, yes. When I'm the only member in the clan, there's only one weak link to take care of.

@Laku: ty veri muzh


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on August 11, 2009, 01:55:55 pm
Fine, frist of all welcome back Oberon ;D

I am looking forward to have nice games! ??? :D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 28, 2009, 11:35:07 am
Hello! DoA is back. We rock, you don't. Period.

[DoA] 2-0 [Sn]


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Deya on September 28, 2009, 03:12:26 pm
Haha :) was a good game.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on September 28, 2009, 05:20:04 pm
yaya, nice to see u back! ;D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 28, 2009, 06:50:45 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [vB]
Rakkula, magma, Deya versus iliera, Nelli
[DoA] 1-2 [Axe]
Magma, Deya versus Curaga, Cumiques


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on September 28, 2009, 07:29:17 pm
Welcome back, rakku! Good luck again 8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 28, 2009, 09:12:56 pm
Welcome back, rakku! Good luck again 8)
Again? DoA wasn't dead! I was its leader all this time. Even when I was in vB. But thanks anyway  8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 29, 2009, 06:55:16 pm
Deya and Joonazz taken in DoA as trials.

[DoA] 1-1 [aC]
Will be finished at a later time, later specified. This is because SorZ timed/crashed all the time.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Tafka on September 29, 2009, 07:49:46 pm
Joonazz taken in DoA as trials.
Are you kidding me?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hostile on September 29, 2009, 08:05:49 pm
Joonazz taken in DoA as trials.
Are you kidding me?
Nope, he is not.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on September 29, 2009, 08:19:09 pm
good luck you loser
lag > doa
nack > all


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on September 29, 2009, 08:24:54 pm
Joonazz taken in DoA as trials.
Are you kidding me?
I join Tafka on that one.... Your serious?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Code on September 29, 2009, 08:28:54 pm
they are, and it's awesome, this clan is so entertaining xD
Good luck Jzz and DoA


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on September 29, 2009, 08:29:42 pm
Jonazz? Nice my Jizz!
Good luck in this clan (=


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SorZ on September 29, 2009, 10:01:15 pm
they are, and it's awesome, this clan is so entertaining xD
Good luck Jzz and DoA

I'm sorry but he is out already :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: iliera on September 29, 2009, 10:04:59 pm
joonazz was in doa.. awesome...
btw deya left


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Deya on September 29, 2009, 11:38:37 pm
I didn't.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 30, 2009, 11:57:04 am
If he left, why?

What the hell is wrong with you people? Why can't you leave DoA alone? You're harming it with your bullshit talk. If Joonazz wants to join DoA then it's his decision. Ergo, something you shouldn't get involved with. I'm not sure what has happened, but I'm pretty sure some lxa user(s) account(s) for all this.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: iliera on September 30, 2009, 01:42:21 pm
I'm sorry, if You meant me... But I just saw Deya without tag.. My mistake, obviously.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Tafka on September 30, 2009, 01:42:59 pm
If he left, why?

What the hell is wrong with you people? Why can't you leave DoA alone? You're harming it with your bullshit talk. If Joonazz wants to join DoA then it's his decision. Ergo, something you shouldn't get involved with. I'm not sure what has happened, but I'm pretty sure some lxa user(s) account(s) for all this.
Heh, you're doing it yourself all the time, now that people do that to you, you can't handle it? Joonazz doesn't belong to such a clan like DoA, face it. DoA's not worth him.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Thor on September 30, 2009, 01:58:39 pm
Agreed. Joonazz is not like other DoA members who have been kicked from different clans because of bad behaving/hacking or any else reason.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 30, 2009, 02:56:07 pm
Joonazz is not like other DoA members who have been kicked from different clans because of bad behaving/hacking or any else reason.
Tafka's comment I simply ignore considering it unfounded. So I talk crap about other clans, to their members?

Thor's comment, on the other hand, is very much invalid.
      Karma did cheat, yes. But bear in mind that you provoked him to do so. He's still responsible for cheating, but don't be a hypocrite. Just a bit of hax and he's kicked, I've made this clear to him
       I've had no issues whatsoever with Deyas behavior. If he acts poorly, he'll be kicked. That simple.
       Magma's case I find the most troubling. Not like he has done anything wrong though. You, Thor (and SorZ), kicked magma out of aC without any real evidence of cheating or multiclanning, only calling it possible. While trying to get rid of him you, at the same time, are ruining his reputation. This I find very pathetic.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: RussG on September 30, 2009, 05:40:26 pm
Heh, you're doing it yourself all the time, now that people do that to you, you can't handle it?

/me approves.

About Jzz, there's nothing anyone should analyze about him concerning this, it's his own decision. Whatever...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 30, 2009, 05:49:38 pm
About Jzz, there's nothing anyone should analyze about him concerning this, it's his own decision.
After a discussion with him, I understand why he left. In this case, it seems to have been his "own decision".

@Tafka: Do what all the time myself? Could you be a bit more specific?

[DoA] 1-2 [BB]
Second round very tight, almost victory
Deya, magma versus Joonazz, Lucifer

Deya is now a full member


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: RussG on September 30, 2009, 06:52:11 pm
About Jzz, there's nothing anyone should analyze about him concerning this, it's his own decision.
After a discussion with him, I understand why he left. In this case, it seems to have been his "own decision".

I'm talking about this whole Jzz-leaving-LaG-case.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 30, 2009, 07:16:50 pm
About Jzz, there's nothing anyone should analyze about him concerning this, it's his own decision.
After a discussion with him, I understand why he left. In this case, it seems to have been his "own decision".
I'm talking about this whole Jzz-leaving-LaG-case.
Well I figured it was about this whole Jzz-leaving-DoA-case since this is, afterall, DoA's clan thread...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Tafka on September 30, 2009, 07:22:59 pm
And I was talking about you putting your nose into other clan's business all the time and talking all kind of stuff about them in their threads.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Wooper on September 30, 2009, 09:10:13 pm
I bet Cumi won't be satisfied with aC for more than 2 days. One week at most. Or then he's multiclanning... I recommend some prudence to your recruiting.
Check this and burn!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on September 30, 2009, 09:30:49 pm
I love you Rakkula! <3 Regards to you, darling, by Lodur


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 01, 2009, 11:36:35 am
I bet Cumi won't be satisfied with aC for more than 2 days. One week at most. Or then he's multiclanning... I recommend some prudence to your recruiting.
Check this and burn!
Not the first time Cumi was in aC, is it? How long did it last back then? Was it, perhaps, two days?  :D

@Tafka: well I do say all sorts of stuff in other clans' threads but something that is, imo, directly harmful. At least not all the time. I've done this though, I admit, especially about aC when Karmen joined it.

And after discussing with Joonazz, no lxa user was behind him leaving. So old schemes caught out with me on this one


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on October 01, 2009, 07:29:53 pm
they are, and it's awesome, this clan is so entertaining xD
Good luck Jzz and DoA

I'm sorry but he is out already :P
Surprise?

Good luck with DoA btw. I miss the cws against you guys. :d


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on October 02, 2009, 01:36:31 am
cool to modify my posts rakkula especially after I havent modified any of yours in aC board =) Well I know what to do in the future

It is the 1st time cumi is in aC so TOUCHE WAYS once again

raGedit: It is kinda cool, huh?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Legend on October 02, 2009, 09:30:46 am
Actually you got it wrong there.. in aC-II era, Cumi was in aC for half an hour.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Thor on October 02, 2009, 10:41:50 am


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 11, 2009, 07:55:26 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [BB] ???

If I'm missing any cws from the list, please inform


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Erwan on October 11, 2009, 08:21:16 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [BB] ???
[DoA] 3-1 [BANG]

If I'm missing any cws from the list, please inform
It is not a cw, its a tournament. And this has nothing to do in clanwars results =)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Z01 on October 11, 2009, 09:58:20 pm
If I'm missing any cws from the list, please inform
Will do!

[DoA] vs [AoG] 1 - 2
Most info in the [AoG] thread!
First cw in ages so yeah I had to post it around!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 12, 2009, 10:04:53 am
It is not a cw, its a tournament. And this has nothing to do in clanwars results =)
Oh snap!
[DoA] vs [AoG] 1 - 2
Ehmm... what cw is this? Neva heard of. I'll add it after consulting other clan members


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Tyrael on October 12, 2009, 10:12:25 am
Rakkula, read these:

Unfinished CW against [DoA]

Round one:
Players: [DoA] Hunter and [DoA] Timo. Vs. [AoG] Cald and [AoG] Tyrael
[DoA] settings: Lamda 20lt Rifles
Winner: DoA

Round two:
Players [DoA] Hunter and [DoA] Timo. Vs. [AoG] Cald and [AoG] Buttwankster Z01
[AoG] settings: Jukke Dome 103%lt classic.
Winner: AoG


Games were good, Cald got a bit over heated. Lamda was a close one, Jukke was dominated by us.

PS. Why the hell did you challenge us and then you mysterically had to go? Rage quit when you had 2 kills in Jukke?


I posted this just to say....

Hamsters are sexy!!

Ok maybe not but we did win our CW against [DoA]!!
Last roudn was smoething like 1.0 100% in fossil shits.
We won, Cald thought it was some campy shits but I enjoyed the games alot.
Thanks [DoA]!
Maybe we shall play again sometime!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 12, 2009, 02:59:17 pm
Ooh... no one bothered to report me  :o

I guess it's time for me to discipline my subservients!

[DoA] 2-0 [BANG]
AoG cw added aswell. Nice losing spree


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SorZ on October 12, 2009, 04:52:18 pm
If I'm missing any cws from the list, please inform

Oh almost forgot, seems like DoA did as well.

Quote
2009.09.29
_______________

[aC] 2 versus [DoA] 1

Cumiques, Legend, SorZ - Joonazz, Rakkula

aaaaand...

Quote
2009.09.29
_______________

[aC] 2 versus  [DoA] 1

Legend, Lodur, SorZ, Thor vs. Deya, Karma


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 13, 2009, 10:43:11 am
Nuh-uh, SorZ! That cw where Jizz and I played was never finished, remember? Because you crashed all the time.

I'll confirm that second cw first, then add it.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SorZ on October 13, 2009, 08:30:07 pm
Nuh-uh, SorZ! That cw where Jizz and I played was never finished, remember? Because you crashed all the time.

I'll confirm that second cw first, then add it.

That's correct that it was unfinished.
Until we finished it the day after.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 13, 2009, 08:36:32 pm
That's correct that it was unfinished.
Until we finished it the day after.
Is that so? Who played?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SorZ on October 13, 2009, 09:48:37 pm
That's correct that it was unfinished.
Until we finished it the day after.
Is that so? Who played?

You think I'm telling you lies, or what?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 14, 2009, 09:30:23 am
You think I'm telling you lies, or what?
Nonono. I don't think so. It's simply that I can't recall finishing it and I don't know who was playing. I'll simply confirm who was playing and then add it.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on October 15, 2009, 03:53:17 pm
Ima real jerk thse days! :D:D:D:DDD:::DDD:D I just spam lxa and everyone seems to dislike me now!? :D: jahahha You see I've got thse hug issues in my personal life so I just have to troll lxa and be hated by everyone. Sorry for my pathetic behavior! NACK SO GREAT

Rakkula is sexy
raGedit: Aaww, thank you


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on October 15, 2009, 09:56:08 pm
Ima real jerk thse days! :D:D:D:DDD:::DDD:D I just spam lxa and everyone seems to dislike me now!? :D: jahahha You see I've got thse hug issues in my personal life so I just have to troll lxa and be hated by everyone. Sorry for my pathetic behavior! NACK SO GREAT

Rakkula is sexy
Hug issues? ;o


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 16, 2009, 03:08:51 pm
Ima real jerk thse days! :D:D:D:DDD:::DDD:D I just spam lxa and everyone seems to dislike me now!? :D: jahahha You see I've got thse hug issues in my personal life so I just have to troll lxa and be hated by everyone. Sorry for my pathetic behavior! NACK SO GREAT

Rakkula is sexy
Hug issues? ;o
Yeah, I guess so... He's a bit weird you see


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Deya on October 21, 2009, 03:59:20 pm


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 23, 2009, 11:20:19 am
Deya is kicked out due to bad behavior.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lucifer on October 23, 2009, 12:32:00 pm
Deya, you shouldn't behave so bad. Relax and have fun instead.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on October 23, 2009, 04:10:32 pm
howdy, you have to be a really bad boy, deya xD


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Code on October 23, 2009, 04:17:31 pm
rak's in vB now, so it doesn't really matter..


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on October 23, 2009, 05:22:34 pm
which means that i karmen and deya are alone!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 23, 2009, 07:28:34 pm
Pardon me, but has something important happened that I should be aware about?

I'm in vB? Wohoo!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on October 23, 2009, 07:30:35 pm
magma talked you in, but i can remove you from trials if needed.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 23, 2009, 07:32:57 pm
magma talked you in, but i can remove you from trials if needed.
Nonono. We discussed this with magma already and more that satisfied with this arrangement.

Magma and I decided to leave DoA, yes. We also decided to join the same clan because of our long history in the same clan. Karmen seems to have lost his interest in liero and Deya's poor behavior's result you're all already aware of.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Maxxa on October 23, 2009, 07:52:57 pm
magma talked you in, but i can remove you from trials if needed.
Nonono. We discussed this with magma already and more that satisfied with this arrangement.

Magma and I decided to leave DoA, yes. We also decided to join the same clan because of our long history in the same clan. Karmen seems to have lost his interest in liero and Deya's poor behavior's result you're all already aware of.

And thats why this all vB talk is just fooling since you are both under mine and Sentrys watching secret-trial eye. Maybe now its time to tell the hwole truth what has going on after AwE and GG?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on October 23, 2009, 07:58:48 pm
And that's why all this vB talk is just a scam because you are both under mine and Sentry's watching secret-trial eye. Maybe now it's time to tell the whole truth of what has been going on since AwE and GG?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu_moia-oVI

Relevance? Yeah...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Maxxa on October 23, 2009, 08:01:34 pm
I dont have a clue what you had said but can you really deny it?

raGedit: Corrections are boldened

It can be done like this too, cool, too cool.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 21, 2010, 01:34:44 pm
Yo dawgs! Death on Arrival is back!

The leader is the one and only, the great and mighty Rakkula! His mighty minions of darkness, co-leaders, are Magma and Karma.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Napkin on April 21, 2010, 01:48:02 pm
I hope some of them join, GL with the ressurection. More clans = Better.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 21, 2010, 01:53:23 pm
I hope some of them join, GL with the ressurection. More clans = Better.
Yeah. T3 and DoA arriving at the same time can't be too bad. 2 new clans.

Ipa" joins DoA. Now waiting for the response of the rest invited.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on April 21, 2010, 02:27:48 pm
Yo dawgs! Death on Arrival is back!

The leader is the one and only, the great and mighty Rakkula! His mighty minions of darkness, co-leaders, are Magma and Karma.

Member slots are offered to following players: Erwan, PharaoH, Joni, Ipa and SLAko. If you join right now, you'll receive a premium membership card. But this is not all: mighty Rakkula is willing to spend a few seconds in giving all new members + karma!
So what could I do with this premium membership card?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Nox on April 21, 2010, 04:07:03 pm
Nice :D

raG, you said you wont do DoA again  8)

Lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies lies

Okay..

Good job, welcome back!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 21, 2010, 04:55:07 pm
So what could I do with this premium membership card?
You could buy pot :P

Useless and irrelevant one line posts I remove. And double posts.


Edit: I'll be quite inactice for the rest of the week.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on April 21, 2010, 05:33:35 pm
Rakkulaaaa :D


I just hope that u don't recruit too many stupid boys, so imo just like ipa bit :D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 21, 2010, 05:35:03 pm
I just hope that u don't recruit too many stupid boys, so imo just like ipa bit :D
Aye. If anyone messes around, especially in clan wars, they're kicked. I decided to give Ipa a chance though. If it doesn't work, I kick his nuts in order or out of the clan.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Dropkick on April 21, 2010, 05:39:51 pm
I just hope that u don't recruit too many stupid boys, so imo just like ipa bit :D
Aye. If anyone messes around, especially in clan wars, they're kicked. I decided to give Ipa a chance though. If it doesn't work, I kick his nuts in order or out of the clan.

Good luck DoA, may the force be with you...always


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on April 21, 2010, 07:16:33 pm
I just hope that u don't recruit too many stupid boys, so imo just like ipa bit :D
Aye. If anyone messes around, especially in clan wars, they're kicked. I decided to give Ipa a chance though. If it doesn't work, I kick his nuts in order or out of the clan.

Quote from: Special add to rulebook
Joni is an special guy with this rule, even how bad he would mess things up he will always stay in DoA, if he decides to join DoA.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Sebbe on April 21, 2010, 08:10:52 pm
Death to Strafing, AWW YEAHHHH!!!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 12:39:38 pm
Attention! Specification regarding clan wars against DoA when Rakkula is playing. I've now come to a decision about strafe: if strafe really is a huge issue for you in a clan war, feel free to disable it. If this is the case please note that I will simply change to the laggy 0.57 beta 4 with universal strafe.

So the choice is yours: with strafe allowed, I play with non-laggy and stable rc3 and in any other case I play with the laggy b4.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on April 26, 2010, 12:54:19 pm
Attention! Specification regarding clan wars against DoA when Rakkula is playing. I've now come to a decision about strafe: if strafe really is a huge issue for you in a clan war, feel free to disable it. If this is the case please note that I will simply change to the laggy 0.57 beta 4 with universal strafe.

So the choice is yours: with strafe allowed, I play with non-laggy and stable rc3 and in any other case I play with the laggy b4.
Or just don't cw with DoA?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: sharsh on April 26, 2010, 01:12:11 pm
i love it how you want the majority of lx to change there style for the minority gg buddy have you ever thought about learning how to play with out strafe?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Gigolo on April 26, 2010, 01:16:36 pm
Attention! Specification regarding clan wars against DoA when Rakkula is playing. I've now come to a decision about strafe: if strafe really is a huge issue for you in a clan war, feel free to disable it. If this is the case please note that I will simply change to the laggy 0.57 beta 4 with universal strafe.

So the choice is yours: with strafe allowed, I play with non-laggy and stable rc3 and in any other case I play with the laggy b4.
Or just don't cw with DoA?
We already don't. Jump on the bandwagon!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 02:16:06 pm


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: sharsh on April 26, 2010, 02:20:06 pm
so is your gamin playing style


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 02:27:56 pm
so is your gamin playing style
I've never even played with you, have I? Who are you talk about my gaming style then? Using your brain is allowed.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Gigolo on April 26, 2010, 03:26:49 pm
Sharsh, this is their thread don't be a complete jackass. If you're going to be mean at least be polite about it.


Rakkula, you think we don't have exact same lag when we play you? It works both ways, only we don't mind lag because we can play in it. You don't ask us for cw for lag reasons. We don't ask you for cw for playstyle reasons. Everyone wins.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 04:06:53 pm
Rakkula, you think we don't have exact same lag when we play you? It works both ways, only we don't mind lag because we can play in it.
I know you experience the same lag issues. I'm not saying it's unfair for anyone, I'm saying I don't like playing in lag.
We don't ask you for cw for playstyle reasons.
Please tell me what's wrong with my play style. Do you have any idea what my play style is like? When was the last time we played together? I'm guessing it's been a while, so maybe we should give it another go before you make any claims of any kind of my gaming.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Tafka on April 26, 2010, 04:30:18 pm
Rakkula don't you think that this:
Quote from: Rakkula
Attention! Specification regarding clan wars against DoA when Rakkula is playing. I've now come to a decision about strafe: if strafe really is a huge issue for you in a clan war, feel free to disable it. If this is the case please note that I will simply change to the laggy 0.57 beta 4 with universal strafe.

So the choice is yours: with strafe allowed, I play with non-laggy and stable rc3 and in any other case I play with the laggy b4.
gives a slight idea about how you might play?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on April 26, 2010, 04:33:47 pm
Okay here we go =)

1. Your a runny and campy person.
2. You use lame tactics and tricks ( yes, strafe is included here)
3. your a whiner who cant stand a lose
4. you always get so GODDAMN defansive about everyfreaking thing.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 05:03:39 pm
...gives a slight idea about how you might play?
Umm... no. First of all if it gives a slight idea, it doesn't define how I play. Secondly, I don't see the fact that I need strafe as something that turns my gaming style into something undesireable. Edit: You were after the text's style, huh? That was more of a joke. A crappy joke.

1. Your a runny and campy person.
2. You use lame tactics and tricks ( yes, strafe is included here)
3rd and 4th were irrelevant. To 1# I can find people who disagree with that. All new players who didn't know me when I actually was lame don't think I'm lame. Should tell something about how old grudges remain. Specify my lame tactics and specify why strafe is lame.
4. you always get so GODDAMN defansive about everyfreaking thing.
The reason why I defend and don't attack is that attacking would lead to a flame war.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Kristoffer on April 26, 2010, 05:40:21 pm
fail :D 8)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 05:46:03 pm
fail :D 8)
Okay... I bet that's the best you can do.
Already removed your last message for being... like that post.

gtfo of DoA thread


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Legend on April 26, 2010, 06:34:17 pm
The reason why I defend and don't attack is that attacking would lead to a flame war.
What's wrong with that?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 07:03:29 pm
The reason why I defend and don't attack is that attacking would lead to a flame war.
What's wrong with that?
With flame war? Well despite being hell of a lot fun it doesn't really get anywhere = is pointless


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Sakmongkol on April 26, 2010, 07:09:28 pm
But I still don't see how attacking would lead to a flame war. I mean in a clanwar? I believe the discussion was about Rakkula's playing style after all.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on April 26, 2010, 07:45:30 pm
I dont see how defending dont lead to a whole road of pointless shit nor a flamewar. We will just keep attacking stronger and better!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 08:29:58 pm
But I still don't see how attacking would lead to a flame war. I mean in a clanwar? I believe the discussion was about Rakkula's playing style after all.
Apparently i misundestood but I only blame Huggle's English for that.
And I'm not so GODDAMN defansive about everyfreaking thing.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 08:39:47 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [aC]
[DoA] 0-2 [aC]
Apparently Erwan stated Karma wasn't in DoA and didn't allow him to play  :-X

[DoA] 2-1 [aC]
Magma, Karma, Joni, Rakkula, Erwan versus Legend, Thor, Lodur, Lucifer and Hermod
Good games.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on April 26, 2010, 08:41:43 pm
Sorry for having math whole day while my eyes are about to drop out of my skulls, for that matter i am hell tierd to. So sorry if you did not use 2 min to try to understand my goddamn post!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 26, 2010, 08:45:31 pm
Sorry for having math whole day while my eyes are about to drop out of my skulls, for that matter i am hell tierd to. So sorry if you did not use 2 min to try to understand my goddamn post!
C'mon! That was just like any other post of yours.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on April 26, 2010, 08:54:50 pm
Your telling me that i acctually have to use a few mins on making these post correct? As with spelling and grammars? I just dont see the point as you can understand my posts well enough, don't tell me that you are so stupid that you dont get simple english.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Captain Nack Sparrow on April 26, 2010, 09:30:16 pm
lolol cool crew! joni karma erwanus! i must comeback soon to kick ya asses losaZ


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 27, 2010, 12:44:49 pm
Your telling me that i acctually have to use a few mins on making these post correct? As with spelling and grammars? I just dont see the point as you can understand my posts well enough, don't tell me that you are so stupid that you dont get simple english.
The spelling doesn't matter as long as the words are decipherable but grammar does. The thing is, there's always a risk of misunderstanding. If you spent those two minutes in making a correct post that risk would be minimal.

[DoA] 0-2 [aC]


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on April 28, 2010, 03:08:27 pm
lolololol
laku was joikkeli


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Laku on April 28, 2010, 03:11:21 pm
lolololol
laku was joikkeli

lolo :D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on April 28, 2010, 07:30:39 pm
laku was joikkeli
lolo :D
Rly? So you were the whiny lagger who messed up clan wars blaming the rest of us? Good for you, Laku!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 01, 2010, 03:40:54 pm
[DoA] 1-2 [MoM]Godlike's ultimate laming, running, camping and saving saved them in the last round. Good job.
[DoA] 1-1 [MoM]


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on May 01, 2010, 03:53:00 pm
Did u play that cw?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: RussG on May 01, 2010, 03:57:05 pm
[DoA] 1-2 [MoM]Godlike's ultimate laming, running, camping and saving saved them in the last round. Good job.
[DoA] 1-1 [MoM]

care tear whatever. shut the **** up already


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: KOPecjusz on May 01, 2010, 04:06:23 pm
[DoA] 1-2 [MoM]Godlike's ultimate laming, running, camping and saving saved them in the last round. Good job.
[DoA] 1-1 [MoM]

don't forget about previous one (2,5 already ;)):

#101. [MoM] vs. [DoA]            2-1   1. (http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/9370/73869978.png) 2. (http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/5048/24638526.png) 3. (http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/4290/28292641.png)       |    28.04.2010

#103. [MoM] vs. [DoA]            2-1                    |    01.05.2010
#104. [MoM] vs. [DoA]            1-1                    |    01.05.2010


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Nets on May 01, 2010, 04:12:46 pm
Now thats good sportsmanship..
so you lost, they played better, who cares, now - karma me for no reason.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 01, 2010, 04:41:59 pm
Yeah, I added the old clan wars to the list now.

Now thats good sportsmanship..
so you lost, they played better, who cares, now - karma me for no reason.
Well, though more competitive than normal games, the idea still is, to my mind at least, that both sides have fun. The rest of MoM players played fair and square, so thanks to them. It's simply Godlike's attitude and style that ruined the game. Sure he can play the way he wants but I simply whine for such a play style.
      I don't consider he won by being better: he ran to the other side of the map to reload, waited in one place for DoAs to come to his line of fire and after emptying his clips ran away again.

@Mid: Yes, I played in that cw.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hugglebunny on May 01, 2010, 05:17:30 pm
Cws are about who is the best. Everything is allowed( exept cheating), you lost. It is not a competion of whos the most fair players. No one even care about the results anyways, so quit whine about it.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Tafka on May 01, 2010, 05:19:45 pm
He played so lame and you played a new cw right after? Where's the brain man.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 01, 2010, 05:28:11 pm
He played so lame and you played a new cw right after? Where's the brain man.
Godlike left after first round so it wasn't a problem.

Cw finished
[DoA] 2-1 [MoM]

raGeDit:
Finished an unfinished aC clan war:
[DoA] 2-1 [aC]
And played another one:
[DoA] 2-0 [aC]
Rakkula and Ipa versus Thor and Hermod.
Good games!

[DoA] 2-1 [MoM]
Joni and Rakkula versus Deathman and GoDliKe.
Don't ask.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on May 01, 2010, 09:07:37 pm
[DoA] 2-1 [MoM]
Joni and Rakkula versus Deathman and GoDliKe.
Don't ask.
I won teh flamewar , btw.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on May 01, 2010, 09:26:00 pm
Yeah, I added the old clan wars to the list now.

Now thats good sportsmanship..
so you lost, they played better, who cares, now - karma me for no reason.
Well, though more competitive than normal games, the idea still is, to my mind at least, that both sides have fun. The rest of MoM players played fair and square, so thanks to them. It's simply Godlike's attitude and style that ruined the game. Sure he can play the way he wants but I simply whine for such a play style.
      I don't consider he won by being better: he ran to the other side of the map to reload, waited in one place for DoAs to come to his line of fire and after emptying his clips ran away again.
@Mid: Yes, I played in that cw.
Wasn't in some clanthread something about ur playing style (maybe Q?)? And excatly the bolded part of that fits what u did perfectly! :D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 02, 2010, 12:24:56 pm
Wasn't in some clanthread something about ur playing style (maybe Q?)? And excatly the bolded part of that fits what u did perfectly! :D
Yeah, like more than a year ago. I must say I was pretty much like GodLiKe back then by my attitude and gaming style. But not as horrific I might add.

@iliera: Do you automatically associate strafers with lamers? I mean, there are lots of strafers, me included, that aren't lame. Strafe makes no-one lame, imo. It's just how you use it.

@clan: report all clan wars played to me....


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ONeill on May 02, 2010, 02:43:36 pm
Wasn't in some clanthread something about ur playing style (maybe Q?)? And excatly the bolded part of that fits what u did perfectly! :D
Yeah, like more than a year ago. I must say I was pretty much like GodLiKe back then by my attitude and gaming style. But not as horrific I might add.
Yes! There must be coming one Rakkula more!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 03, 2010, 07:56:25 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Str8]
Magma and Ipa versus Thug and Jesse


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SorZ on May 03, 2010, 10:48:18 pm
For the old times sake I have to point out that your cw-list lack follwoing cws:

[aC] 2-0 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]

Those results can be found posted in our cw-section, cheers.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on May 04, 2010, 10:03:51 am
For the old times sake I have to point out that your cw-list lack follwoing cws:

[aC] 2-0 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]

Those results can be found posted in our cw-section, cheers.
Screens or it didn't happen.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on May 04, 2010, 12:21:52 pm
Round 1 (http://regmedia.co.uk/2005/05/24/paris_hilton.jpg)

Round 2 (http://a44paco.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/jennifer-aniston.jpg)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 04, 2010, 12:34:22 pm
[aC] 2-0 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
Really? I will definitely need screenshots for those. In case you don't have them, the names of the DoA players participating in that clan war so that I can ask them.

And for ****'s sake DoA! I want all clan wars reported directly to me or on this very thread!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ on May 04, 2010, 02:37:47 pm
Round 1 (http://regmedia.co.uk/2005/05/24/paris_hilton.jpg)

Round 2 (http://a44paco.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/jennifer-aniston.jpg)

jennifer aniston's ass looks really strange....


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on May 04, 2010, 02:51:57 pm
Round 1 (http://regmedia.co.uk/2005/05/24/paris_hilton.jpg)

Round 2 (http://a44paco.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/jennifer-aniston.jpg)

jennifer aniston's ass looks really strange....

Iguess u mean the left part? True. but if u have a direct look, u'll see difference


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SorZ on May 05, 2010, 02:08:00 am
[aC] 2-0 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
Really? I will definitely need screenshots for those. In case you don't have them, the names of the DoA players participating in that clan war so that I can ask them.

And for ****'s sake DoA! I want all clan wars reported directly to me or on this very thread!

Oh come on, do you think I lie?
Or is it just a lame excuse to not add them?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on May 05, 2010, 01:12:45 pm
[aC] 2-0 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
[aC] 2-1 [DoA]
Really? I will definitely need screenshots for those. In case you don't have them, the names of the DoA players participating in that clan war so that I can ask them.

And for ****'s sake DoA! I want all clan wars reported directly to me or on this very thread!

Oh come on, do you think I lie?
Or is it just a lame excuse to not add them?
you dirty lier! :p


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 10, 2010, 01:28:52 pm
I was spectating, they won, Karma vs Lodur and Luci the remaining, they won :)
This you must elaborate. As I understand it, it was 0 - out to 0 - 0

Edit: [DoA] 1-1 [aC] This was the "2-1 loss" against aC
[DoA] 2-0 [aC]
Karma and magma versus Lucifer and Hermod (?)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 13, 2010, 07:25:16 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [The]
Rakkula and Magma versus Homeless, Fameless and Lameless


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 14, 2010, 10:50:37 am
[DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
Rakkula and Ipa versus Chopper and Rock


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Roxxy~ on May 14, 2010, 11:30:59 am
Horrific, Triple post :oo


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Lodur on May 14, 2010, 11:53:27 am
I was spectating, they won, Karma vs Lodur and Luci the remaining, they won :)
This you must elaborate. As I understand it, it was 0 - out to 0 - 0
Edit: [DoA] 1-1 [aC] This was the "2-1 loss" against aC

Ask Karma we won that cw <__<


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 18, 2010, 02:05:00 pm
[DoA] 1-2 [aC]
Rakkula and Magma versus Lodur and Rambake. Very tight and enjoyable last round. Lodur ended up winning with 3-5 health points. Good games!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 25, 2010, 04:38:53 pm
Mighty Magma has quit LX for the second time. All the best for him!
He's been a part of GG/DoA since the very beginning and has earned a place in the honorary retired members list.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on May 27, 2010, 03:30:27 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [Cop]
[DoA] 2-0 [Cop]
Rakkula and Karma versus IRC and Isnaard
Good games!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on May 27, 2010, 06:25:43 pm
[DoA] vs [aC] | 1-2
____

(http://s1.postimage.org/lcDuJ.jpg) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=gxlcDuJ)
R1: Rifles, Lamda - [DoA] wins

no screen, sorry folks
R2: Rifles, LF(R) - [aC] wins

(http://s1.postimage.org/lcyvr.jpg) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=gxlcyvr)
R3: Neutral set - [aC] wins


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on June 01, 2010, 10:49:00 pm
CW reportasion:
[DoA] vs [Wol] | 2-0
[DoA] vs [aC] | 0-2
[DoA] vs [aC] | 0-2


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on June 02, 2010, 01:51:56 pm
Oh jeez... Damn aC kicked Hermod and Lucifer left. Now we can't beat aC even if we wait for the right moment (like we did when Hermod and Luci were still aC): we attacked them when the weakest players were online. Guerrilla warfare doesn't work anymore it seems. God damn.

For my satisfaction, maybe I should post that pic where I beat Thor 4-out in rifles  8)

aC is the greatest! Good for you guys.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Thor on June 02, 2010, 02:34:21 pm
For my satisfaction, maybe I should post that pic where I beat Thor 4-out in rifles  8)

Yeah, I indeed sucked, I played with one hand (while my second hand was making camera up for getting a picture of Putin), and got only one kill. :(


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on June 02, 2010, 03:00:22 pm
Yeah, I indeed sucked, I played with one hand (while my second hand was making camera up for getting a picture of Putin), and got only one kill. :(
That's what they all say )8D


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on June 03, 2010, 08:55:27 pm
[DoA] vs [Osp] | 2-1
________
YB gave up on neutral round, kicked me and karma = win for us!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on June 04, 2010, 12:05:42 pm
YB gave up on neutral round, kicked me and karma = win for us!
Yeah. That's so like him.

Oh by the way, Erwan left DoA like a week ago... in order to join Wol!  ???


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on June 07, 2010, 03:11:50 pm
2 clanwars against [nGu] // 1st. 2-0 for us // 2nd. 2-1 for us


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on June 09, 2010, 01:25:28 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [nGu]
[DoA] 2-0 [nGu]
[DoA] 2-0 [nGu]


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on June 11, 2010, 02:01:45 pm
[DoA] 2-0 -MF-
[DoA] 2-0 -MF-


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on June 15, 2010, 05:18:40 pm
[DoA] 0-2 [Oe]
[DoA] 1-2 [Oe]
Lots of whine, lag, eating et cetera bad games bye bye


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on July 09, 2010, 11:21:56 am
Happy birthday, Rakkula!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Cizin on July 09, 2010, 01:53:41 pm
Happy birthday


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rock on July 09, 2010, 02:22:16 pm
Happy Birthday XD


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Dropkick on July 09, 2010, 04:50:02 pm
Happy birthday!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Napkin on July 09, 2010, 10:18:10 pm
I wont say happy birthday because that was so lame!
Sorry Rakkula nothing personal!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jawal on July 09, 2010, 10:19:04 pm
Happy Birthday MISTER BLISTER !!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Roxxy~ on July 20, 2010, 01:11:14 pm
Happy Birthday, dude!


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Dropkick on July 20, 2010, 01:27:18 pm
Happy Birthday, dude!

A lil late now are we?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Roxxy~ on July 20, 2010, 01:33:07 pm
Happy Birthday, dude!

A lil late now are we?
Whups. :D:D::D:D Stuff happens. xd


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 03, 2010, 05:21:40 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
Rakkula and Joni versus QuiverZ, Nox, Jage and Luci

Oh yeah: an announcement: Ipa left DoA like 2 months ago.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on August 03, 2010, 05:40:51 pm
Are you sure? he sometimes plays with DoA tag


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Dropkick on August 03, 2010, 06:34:39 pm
Ive asked him myself and he said that he left DoA O.o


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on August 03, 2010, 07:52:38 pm
/care

i mean, really, as i told u that "new members" back then all failed :D :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 03, 2010, 10:47:06 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [BP]
[DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
[DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
Rakkula, Karma and Joni versus the other players.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on August 03, 2010, 10:49:18 pm
Cool I am the only "member".


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Roxxy~ on August 03, 2010, 10:50:34 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [BP]
[DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
[DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
Rakkula, Karma and Joni versus the other players.
Respect, Joni poooooooooowns! <3


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on August 04, 2010, 11:41:50 am
[DoA] 2-0 [BP]
[DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
[DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
Rakkula, Karma and Joni versus the other players.
I'd like to point out that you didn't play for DoA in that BP cw. Check your screenshots if you don't believe me.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 04, 2010, 12:32:43 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [BP]
[DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
[DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
Rakkula, Karma and Joni versus the other players.
I'd like to point out that you didn't play for DoA in that BP cw. Check your screenshots if you don't believe me.
So what? I just named all DoA members who had to do with those cws

Edit: Actually I did play in that cw. It was against D'J (Laku) and the you, Jage.
Sooo.... what you said suggests that we had a second clan war by Karma and Joni. Alright. [DoA] 2-0 [BP]


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on August 04, 2010, 12:43:30 pm
[DoA] 2-0 [BP]
[DoA] 2-0 [WvW]
[DoA] 2-0 [Wol]
Rakkula, Karma and Joni versus the other players.
I'd like to point out that you didn't play for DoA in that BP cw. Check your screenshots if you don't believe me.
So what? I just named all DoA members who had to do with those cws

Edit: Actually I did play in that cw. It was against D'J (Laku) and the you, Jage.
Sooo.... what you said suggests that we had a second clan war by Karma and Joni. Alright. [DoA] 2-0 [BP]
I meant that BP didn't play cw against DoA, but against Wol.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on August 05, 2010, 01:01:41 pm
Oh **** I forgot. Busted...


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 10, 2010, 07:58:44 am
Joni and Karma left like a month ago. Only the very best player stayed loyal to mighty DoA. I still lead this clan, however I can multiclan. Note that DoA won't cw because it only has 1 player, so multiclanning shouldn't be a problem.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Jage on September 10, 2010, 01:30:59 pm
When are you gonna merge with HP? ;o


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Hermod on September 10, 2010, 01:32:36 pm
When are you gonna merge with HP? ;o

It's not going to happen.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Bizkit on September 10, 2010, 08:42:34 pm
What? You got some inside information, Hermod?

Although there may be issues concerning the clan name, it could very well happen if Rakkula was online for once..


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 11, 2010, 10:30:16 am
Although there may be issues concerning the clan name, it could very well happen if Rakkula was online for once..
Ooh ye... I'm busy with school, cleaning the ****ing appartment and playing css. Not much time for lx.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: SLak0n on September 11, 2010, 10:31:57 am
Although there may be issues concerning the clan name, it could very well happen if Rakkula was online for once..
Ooh ye... I'm busy with school, cleaning the ****ing appartment and playing css. Not much time for lx.

add me on steam aleeex1995


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Midnight on September 11, 2010, 11:28:59 am
I like DoA, and Rak  :-*


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Nox on September 11, 2010, 11:30:06 am
add ssanteri63 too :P


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 08, 2011, 02:48:03 pm
Good news, everyone! DoA is back!

Average skill level is of course incredibly high because I'm its only member.

Haven't looked it this thread for like a year...

O' ye.. I of course multiclan because DoA isn't very able to do clan wars.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: joni on September 08, 2011, 03:06:36 pm
Good news, everyone! DoA is back!

Average skill level is of course incredibly high because I'm its only member.

Haven't looked it this thread for like a year...

O' ye.. I of course multiclan because DoA isn't very able to do clan wars.

wanna join R?


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ on September 08, 2011, 03:26:35 pm
Good news, everyone! DoA is back!

Average skill level is of course incredibly high because I'm its only member.

Haven't looked it this thread for like a year...

O' ye.. I of course multiclan because DoA isn't very able to do clan wars.

wanna join R?

want me to leave R?
and he already is in R undercover(haven't you noticed how magma plays?)


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 08, 2011, 04:01:49 pm
wanna join R?
Sure... Until I get the chance to steal enough R players to stabilize DoA.

and he already is in R undercover (haven't you noticed how magma plays?)
Yeah, he's pretty awesome... but no, I'm not magma. We even played at the same time once so I can't be faking him.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: ٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶ on September 08, 2011, 05:29:12 pm
wanna join R?
Sure... Until I get the chance to steal enough R players to stabilize DoA.

and he already is in R undercover (haven't you noticed how magma plays?)
Yeah, he's pretty awesome... but no, I'm not magma. We even played at the same time once so I can't be faking him.

wow you played at the same time once.. now i'm convinced, you've never used magma's name.


Title: Re: Death On Arrival - DoA
Post by: Rakkula on September 09, 2011, 01:39:01 pm
wow you played at the same time once.. now i'm convinced, you've never used magma's name.
Doesn't really matter. Prove me guilty or be forever silent... at least on DoA thread.